Adjustable Sealing Device for Drum Emptying

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing emptying devices for containers with powdery or granular products require complex and time-consuming manual operations, especially when connecting drums to isolators, which increases the risk of contamination and requires extensive cleaning.

Innovation Solution

An emptying device with a docking portion featuring an adjustable sealing device and an adapter piece for flexible containers, allowing for a sealed connection without an isolator, thereby simplifying and speeding up the emptying process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If an isolator is used to seal off the drum from the external environment, then contamination prevention is improved, but device complexity and cleaning effort increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontamination preventionVSAvoidisolator structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sealing system is divided into two separate sealing locations: a first sealing device between the docking portion and the drum opening, and a second sealing device between the docking portion and the adapter piece. This segmentation eliminates the need for a complex isolator structure while maintaining contamination prevention through multiple sealed zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The isolator is completely removed from the system. Instead of using a large isolator enclosure, the patent extracts the sealing function and implements it through localized sealing devices at critical interfaces, significantly simplifying the overall device structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If an isolator is used to prevent material escape, then safety is improved, but the dimensions of the emptying device increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial containmentVSAvoidemptying device footprint
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The containment function is segmented into localized sealing zones rather than requiring a single large isolator enclosure. The first sealing device seals the drum opening area, while the second sealing device seals the adapter piece interface, achieving material containment with minimal footprint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The adapter piece includes a sealing portion with a sealing edge that forms a flexible seal against the docking portion. This flexible sealing mechanism provides effective material containment without requiring a rigid, space-consuming isolator structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

3Ease of operation

If manual operations are used to connect the drum to the isolator, then ease of operation is reduced, but setup time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocking procedureVSAvoidconnection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The sealing system is designed to be self-aligning and self-sealing. The first sealing device automatically seals when the docking portion is positioned at the drum opening, and the second sealing device seals when the adapter piece is inserted. This eliminates the need for complex manual sealing operations and reduces connection time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The sealing devices are designed with dynamic characteristics that allow automatic adaptation during the docking process. The flexible sealing elements can deform and conform to the mating surfaces as the components are brought together, enabling quick and easy connection without precise manual alignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Device complexity

If an adjustable sealing device is used instead of an isolator, then device complexity is reduced, but sealing reliability must be maintained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing systemVSAvoidseal integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The sealing function is divided into two independent sealing devices rather than one complex isolator system. Each sealing device focuses on a specific interface, making them simpler in structure while collectively providing robust seal integrity across both critical locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The sealing portion of the adapter piece uses a flexible sealing edge that can conform to the docking portion surface, ensuring reliable sealing even with manufacturing tolerances or surface irregularities. This flexible sealing approach maintains high seal integrity with a simple device structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Data Source

PatentUS20250074724A1Emptying device for emptying a container
Publication Date: 2025.03.06 HECHT TECHNOLOGIE GMBH
  • US20250074724A1 patent drawing
  • US20250074724A1 patent drawing
  • US20250074724A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The application relates to an emptying device for emptying a container containing a product, including: a docking portion for docking to a rigid container to be emptied, in particular a drum, wherein in the docking portion a passage is formed by an adjustable sealing device, wherein the passage can be adjusted via the sealing device in such a way that an adapter piece being fixed to a flexible container enclosing the product, in particular a liner or a film bag, inside the rigid container, can be fastened within the passage in such a way that an enclosed inner space defined by the docking portion and the rigid container is sealed off from an external environment.