Adjustable Shock Absorbers for Off-Road Vehicles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current off-road recreational vehicles require vehicles to be stopped for manual adjustments of shock absorbers, which can be inconvenient and inefficient, especially when using adjustable electric shocks with active ride control systems.

Innovation Solution

A tracked vehicle with electronically controlled adjustable shock absorbers that allow for real-time adjustment of damping characteristics using an electronic controller, responsive to operator inputs and vehicle characteristics such as speed, acceleration, and terrain conditions, enabling continuous control of compression and rebound damping.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual adjustment of shock absorbers is used, then adjustment capability is provided, but vehicle operation is interrupted and efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock absorber adjustmentVSAvoidvehicle operation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical adjustment systems with electronic control systems. Sensors detect vehicle conditions (speed, acceleration, terrain) and an electronic controller automatically adjusts shock absorber damping characteristics, eliminating the need for manual intervention and maintaining continuous vehicle operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The suspension system becomes self-regulating through automatic electronic control. The system monitors its own operating conditions via sensors and autonomously adjusts shock absorber settings without external human input, enabling the vehicle to adapt to changing terrain and operational conditions in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If electronic control systems are added, then real-time adjustment capability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time suspension controlVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The electronic control system is divided into modular functional components: sensors for detecting vehicle parameters, an electronic controller for processing data and making decisions, and actuators for executing adjustments. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and simplifies the overall system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The electronic control system serves multiple functions: it monitors various vehicle parameters (speed, acceleration, terrain), processes this information, and controls shock absorber adjustments. This multi-functionality consolidates what could be multiple separate systems into a single integrated control unit, reducing overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20230331346A1Systems and methods of adjustable suspensions for off-road recreational vehicles
Publication Date: 2023.10.19 POLARIS IND INC
  • US20230331346A1 patent drawing
  • US20230331346A1 patent drawing
  • US20230331346A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A tracked vehicle may include a plurality of ground engaging members coupled to a frame through a plurality of suspensions, the plurality of suspensions including at least one adjustable shock absorber.