Adjustable Stand Assembly for Multi-Orientation Device Support

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current computing devices with pivotable displays and stands lack ergonomic flexibility, often causing discomfort due to springy keyboard keys and limited adjustability, which affects user interaction and workspace organization.

Innovation Solution

A stand with adjustable coupling and articulating members that supports computing devices in various orientations, including horizontal and vertical positions, allowing for customizable display angles and keyboard orientations to enhance user comfort and workspace efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a fixed stand structure is used to support the device, then the device can be supported in a stable position, but the ergonomic flexibility and adjustability are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadjustabilityVSAvoidstand structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The stand is divided into multiple independent articulating members (first articulating member, second articulating member, third articulating member) that can move relative to each other. Each member provides a degree of freedom for adjustment, allowing the device to be positioned in multiple orientations while maintaining structural stability through the segmented design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The stand incorporates joints with springs and detent mechanisms that allow dynamic adjustment between fixed positions. The springs provide flexible positioning within ranges of motion, while the detent mechanisms lock the articulating members at specific angles, enabling the stand to transition between stable fixed positions and adjustable states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If springy keyboard keys are used in the device, then the keyboard can provide tactile feedback, but user comfort is reduced due to excessive springiness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser comfortVSAvoidkey stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The stand adjusts the orientation and position of the device, changing the gravitational force parameters acting on the keyboard. By positioning the device at optimized angles, the effective weight and springiness of the keys are reduced, improving typing comfort while maintaining adequate tactile feedback through the natural key mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If the device is supported in multiple orientations, then ergonomic flexibility is improved, but the stability of each orientation may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorientation flexibilityVSAvoidorientation stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The stand uses dynamic joints with spring-detent mechanisms that allow smooth transitions between orientations while providing stable locking at each position. The springs enable flexible positioning during adjustment, and the detent mechanisms ensure stable locking once the desired orientation is reached, maintaining both adaptability and stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The multi-segmented articulating structure distributes the device weight across multiple support points and allows independent adjustment of each segment. This segmentation enables the stand to achieve stable equilibrium in various orientations by adjusting the configuration of individual members rather than requiring the entire structure to be rigid.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Ease of manufacture

If the stand structure is simplified, then manufacturing is easier, but the ability to support devices in various orientations is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestand fabricationVSAvoidorientation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The stand is constructed from multiple identical or similar articulating member segments that can be manufactured using the same processes and then assembled in different configurations. This segmentation allows for simplified manufacturing of individual components while achieving complex orientation capabilities through their combination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each articulating member is designed as a universal component that can function in multiple positions and orientations. The standardized joints and connection mechanisms allow the same components to serve multiple functions, simplifying manufacturing while providing the versatility to support devices in various orientations through different arrangements of the universal modules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11234510B2Device and stand assembly
Publication Date: 2022.02.01 LENOVO SWITZERLAND INTERNATIONAL GMBH
  • US11234510B2 patent drawing
  • US11234510B2 patent drawing
  • US11234510B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An assembly can include a rectangular device that includes an x dimension, a y dimension and a display; and a stand that supports the rectangular device in different orientations, where the different orientations include a horizontal orientation of the x dimension and a horizontal orientation of the y dimension, where the stand includes an adjustable coupling that physically supports at least a portion of a mass of the rectangular device in the horizontal orientation of the x dimension and that physically supports at least a portion of a mass of the rectangular device in the horizontal orientation of the y dimension.