Adjustable Support Saddle for Combine Harvester Headers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing header trailers for combine harvesters are inflexible and cannot accommodate different types of cutting units with varying orientations, leading to unstable transport and restricted use on public roads due to fixed orientations and varying feeder duct spacings.

Innovation Solution

A header trailer with an adjustable support saddle that can pivot and adjust its position relative to the chassis, allowing the cutting unit to be supported in multiple orientations and positions, with a pivot axis close to the center of gravity to minimize tilting and accommodate different combine harvester types.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a fixed support saddle design is used, then the structure is simple and stable, but it cannot accommodate different types of cutting units with varying orientations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccommodation of different cutting unit typesVSAvoidsupport saddle structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The support saddle is designed with movable components including a transverse beam that can shift laterally and longitudinal beams that can adjust their positions. This dynamic structure allows the support saddle to adapt to different cutting unit types and orientations while maintaining structural stability, resolving the contradiction between versatility and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The support saddle is divided into multiple independent adjustable components: transverse beams, longitudinal beams, and support points. Each segment can be independently positioned to accommodate specific cutting unit requirements. This segmentation allows versatile adaptation without requiring complete redesign of the entire structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Area of stationary object

If the header is placed off-centre to make the gap for the feeder housing wide, then the feeder duct insertion space is improved, but the lateral overhang exceeds legal restrictions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeeder duct insertion spaceVSAvoidlateral overhang violation
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The support saddle enables dynamic positioning of the cutting unit both laterally and longitudinally. This allows the cutting unit to be precisely positioned to maximize feeder duct insertion space while keeping the lateral overhang within legal limits, resolving the spatial contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows changing the position parameters of the cutting unit on the transport vehicle. By adjusting the lateral and longitudinal positions, the optimal balance between feeder duct space and legal overhang restrictions is achieved.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Stability of the object's composition

If the center of gravity is placed low and precisely on the longitudinal center plane for stable mounting, then transport stability is improved, but the insertion space for the feed channel is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransport stabilityVSAvoidfeeder duct insertion space
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The adjustable support saddle allows dynamic positioning of the cutting unit's center of gravity. The support points can be positioned to maintain stable mounting while the entire assembly can be shifted to create adequate feeder duct insertion space, resolving the contradiction between stability and space requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple intermediate supports are added to transport different header types, then adaptability is improved, but the device complexity and number of components increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheader type compatibilityVSAvoidnumber of support components
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The support saddle is designed as a universal structure with adjustable transverse and longitudinal beams that can accommodate multiple header types. Instead of adding separate intermediate supports for each header type, the same support saddle can be reconfigured through beam adjustments to suit different configurations, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP2042024B1Harvesting car
Publication Date: 2011.04.06 CLAAS SELBSTFAHRENDE ERNTEMASCHINEN GMBH
  • EP2042024B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2042024B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

The carriage has a pedestal (12) formed to firmly support a cutting unit (16) placed on the pedestal, where the pedestal is movably guided on a longitudinal support (1), a coupling (2), an axle (3) and a diagonal strut (4), with a single degree of freedom of swiveling motion. A rotary axis (27) of the swiveling motion runs above the pedestal. The distance of the rotary axis from the centre of the cutting unit loaded on the pedestal is smaller than one third of the distance between the rotary axis and a support point of the cutting unit on the pedestal.