Adjustable Support for Small Gauge Surgical Instruments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Small gauge surgical instruments used in ophthalmological procedures are excessively flexible, leading to loss of control and imprecision during delicate maneuvers due to their small diameter, making precise repositioning and procedures like peripheral vitreous removal challenging.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates an adjustable support mechanism within a base unit that allows varying levels of lateral support for small diameter instruments, using a sliding support frame with rods and an adjustment mechanism to enhance stiffness, ensuring precise control without compromising access to all parts of the vitreous cavity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If smaller diameter instruments are used, then incision size and trauma are reduced, but instrument flexibility increases causing loss of control and imprecision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveincision sizeVSAvoidcontrol precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The instrument is divided into multiple sections: a flexible small-diameter distal section for surgical operations and a larger proximal section providing structural support. This segmentation allows the distal tip to remain flexible for minimal incisions while the proximal portion provides the rigidity needed for precise control during manipulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The instrument transitions from a uniform small diameter to a graduated diameter structure, where the diameter increases along the length of the instrument. This dimensional change allows the tip to maintain small size for precise surgical work while the base provides larger diameter for enhanced control and stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If smaller diameter instruments are used, then patient comfort and healing are improved, but instrument stiffness decreases leading to unwanted flexing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient traumaVSAvoidinstrument stiffness
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The instrument shaft is segmented into a flexible distal portion and a rigid proximal portion. The distal portion maintains small diameter for minimal patient trauma, while the proximal portion increases in diameter to provide the necessary stiffness and structural stability to prevent unwanted flexing during surgical manipulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The instrument employs composite construction with materials of different mechanical properties. The distal section uses more flexible materials suitable for small gauge applications, while the proximal section incorporates stiffer materials to maintain instrument stability and resist flexing, creating a composite structure that balances flexibility and rigidity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS20240277519A1Small gauge surgical instrument with adjustable support
Publication Date: 2024.08.22 RYAN EDWIN
  • US20240277519A1 patent drawing
  • US20240277519A1 patent drawing
  • US20240277519A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A small gauge surgical instrument is shown with advantages such as diminished “play” at the tip. A surgical instrument assembly is also shown with support along a length of the instrument that can be selected by the surgeon. Devices and method described provide adjustability of the instrument without protruding into a gripping surface of the instrument.