Adjustable Transport Wheel for Beverage Containers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing beverage filling systems with rotary designs face challenges in efficiently transporting containers of different formats due to complex mechanisms and high costs associated with adjusting transfer stars to accommodate varying container sizes, leading to reliability issues and inaccurate settings.

Innovation Solution

A transport wheel with a central connection and stacked discs, where at least one disc is adjustable relative to fixed discs, allowing for simplified adjustment of receiving regions via a rotary actuator, eliminating the need for scissor-like mechanisms and enabling accurate adaptation to different container formats while maintaining synchronicity with other system components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If transfer stars with changeable pocket size are used, then adaptability to different container formats is improved, but device complexity increases due to complex adjustment mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different container formatsVSAvoidcomplexity of adjustment mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The transfer star is segmented into multiple adjustable pockets, where each pocket can be independently adjusted in size. This segmentation allows the system to adapt to different container formats while keeping the adjustment mechanism relatively simple, as each pocket operates independently rather than requiring complex coordinated movement of the entire structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The pockets are designed with dynamic adjustment capability, allowing them to change size during operation. The pockets can be adjusted between different size configurations to accommodate various container formats, transforming a static structure into a dynamic one that adapts to different requirements without requiring complete system replacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If complex scissor-like mechanisms are used for pocket adjustment, then pocket size changeability is achieved, but reliability decreases due to self-locking issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepocket size changeabilityVSAvoidreliability of adjustment mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The problematic scissor-like mechanism has been extracted and replaced with a simpler adjustment system. The new design uses a more reliable mechanism that achieves the same pocket size changeability without the self-locking issues inherent in scissor-like structures, thereby improving overall system reliability while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual or actuator adjustment is used, then pocket size can be changed, but manufacturing precision is reduced due to tolerance accumulation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepocket size adjustabilityVSAvoidprecision of pocket positioning
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The adjustment mechanism incorporates feedback elements that allow for precise positioning and verification of pocket locations. This feedback system enables the operator or control system to verify that pockets are correctly positioned after adjustment, compensating for potential tolerance accumulation and ensuring manufacturing precision is maintained even as pocket sizes are changed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Stability of the object's composition

If fixed pocket positions are maintained during adjustment, then synchronicity with other carousels is preserved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynchronicity with upstream and downstream carouselsVSAvoidcomplexity of adjustment mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The adjustment mechanism employs asymmetric design principles where the method of maintaining pocket position differs from the method of adjusting pocket size. This asymmetric approach allows the system to achieve both goals - maintaining synchronicity through position preservation while enabling size adjustment - without requiring overly complex mechanisms that would be needed if symmetric approaches were used for both functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentUS12129130B2Device and method for transporting containers
Publication Date: 2024.10.29 KRONES AG
  • US12129130B2 patent drawing
  • US12129130B2 patent drawing
  • US12129130B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device for transporting containers with a transport wheel, which includes: a central connection configured to fasten the transport wheel to a central rotational shaft, so that a rotation of the central rotational shaft about the rotational axis thereof is able to be transmitted to the transport wheel; a plurality of discs which are concentrically stacked one on top of the other relative to the rotational axis in the axial direction and which in each case have at least one recess, which jointly form a receiving region which is provided on an outer circumference of the transport wheel, wherein at least one of the discs is a fixed disc and at least one of the discs is an adjustment disc; and an adjustment mechanism which is configured to rotate the adjustment disc by an adjustment angle, whereby the size of the receiving region is adjustable.