Adjustable Trim Tab Surface Area Optimization for Marine Fuel Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing trim tab technologies face limitations in optimizing surface area and adaptability to varying speeds, leading to suboptimal hydrodynamic efficiency and increased fuel consumption in marine craft.

Innovation Solution

The method involves calculating and optimizing the surface area of trim tabs based on the hull's dimensions, using a fluid-hinge connection to allow for adjustable angles, and employing actuators to lower or raise the trim tabs depending on speed, thereby enhancing lift and reducing drag.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If trim tab surface area is increased to improve hydrodynamic efficiency, then fuel efficiency improves, but device complexity increases due to larger adjustment mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel efficiencyVSAvoidadjustment mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the trim tab surface area adjustable rather than fixed. The system dynamically changes the effective surface area of the trim tab based on operating conditions (speed, boat type, load), allowing optimization of fuel efficiency at each operating point while avoiding the need for excessively large tabs that would be required for all-condition performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of trim tab surface area from a fixed design value to a variable parameter. By adjusting the surface area parameter in response to operational parameters (speed, hull type), the system achieves optimal fuel efficiency without requiring the maximum possible surface area, thus reducing the complexity of adjustment mechanisms needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If fixed surface area trim tabs are used, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to varying speeds and conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrim tab structure simplicityVSAvoidadaptability to varying speeds
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the static trim tab design into a dynamic system where the effective surface area can be adjusted during operation. This allows the same physical structure to adapt to varying speeds and conditions, maintaining simplicity while gaining versatility through controlled adjustment capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal trim tab system that can function effectively across multiple operating conditions (different speeds, boat types, loads) by adjusting surface area. This multi-functional capability allows a single design to serve various purposes without requiring separate specialized tabs for each condition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Force

If larger trim tab surface area is used to increase lift, then hydrodynamic performance improves, but drag increases at low speeds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelift forceVSAvoiddrag at low speeds
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by adjusting the trim tab surface area based on the boat's operating speed and conditions. At high speeds, a larger effective surface area generates sufficient lift to reduce drag and improve hydrodynamic performance. At low speeds, the surface area is reduced to minimize drag while still providing necessary lift control, preventing energy loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the surface area parameter dynamically to match operational requirements. By increasing surface area when high lift is needed (high speed) and decreasing it when drag minimization is prioritized (low speed), the system optimizes the balance between lift and drag across the operating range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach improves fuel efficiency by reducing drag and increasing lift at both high and low speeds, minimizing the need for submersible flow interceptors and allowing for greater control over the marine craft's glide angle, resulting in reduced fuel costs and enhanced performance.

Implementation Method 1

The method involves calculating and optimizing the surface area of trim tabs based on the hull's dimensions, using a fluid-hinge connection to allow for adjustable angles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrodynamic pressure: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

using a fluid-hinge to connect the front-most portion of the planar surface to the hull

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid hinge mechanism: Hinge

Implementation Method 3

employing actuators to lower or raise the trim tabs depending on speed, thereby enhancing lift and reducing drag

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical actuation: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 4

enhancing lift and reducing drag... increasing the marine craft's glide angle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrodynamic lift: Aerofoil

Implementation Method 5

reducing drag... resulting in reduced fuel costs and enhanced performance

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDrag reduction: Drag

Data Source

PatentUS10005527B2Method for optimizing surface area and use of adjustable trim-tabs for increasing fuel efficiency of a watercraft
Publication Date: 2018.06.26 LANGLOIS JOSEPH R
  • US10005527B2 patent drawing
  • US10005527B2 patent drawing
  • US10005527B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for watercraft efficiency at various speeds by use of at least one adjustable trim tab with a surface by calculating by the total surface area of the planar surface and determining the surface area necessary of the planar surface of at least one trim tab, and mounting the trim tab substantially under the hull. Provided in the method is determining the overall length of the hull, determining the maximum beam of the hull, multiplying the overall length of the hull by the maximum beam, taking a resultant of the overall length and maximum beam and multiplying that resultant by a percentage in the range of about one to about three, and taking the resultant and dividing it by the number of trim tabs mounted to the hull. Adjusting the trim tab by raising or lowering the rear of the planar surface, based on speed, to achieve higher efficiency.