Admittance Mechanism for Automated Software Access Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In industrial settings, especially in hard-to-reach and critical environments like refineries and power plants, existing technologies lack an efficient mechanism to manage the admittance of software items into computing devices, leading to potential malfunctions and the need for costly and dangerous human intervention for maintenance or fault restoration.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic rule-based system with an admittance mechanism that determines whether interactions between software items and computing devices are allowed by applying a set of rules, ensuring compliance with placement criteria, and utilizing a controller to bring devices to a controlled state for access management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual human intervention is used to restore faults in critical industrial computing systems, then system reliability can be maintained, but operational safety decreases and downtime increases due to the dangerous and costly nature of human access to hard-to-reach environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidoperational safety
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The computing device performs self-diagnosis and self-restoration through an automated admittance mechanism that monitors system state, identifies faults, and executes recovery procedures without human intervention. The device brings itself to a controlled state, evaluates access requests from software items, and restores normal operation autonomously, eliminating the need for dangerous manual intervention while maintaining system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If manual human intervention is used to restore faults in critical industrial computing systems, then system reliability can be maintained, but productivity decreases due to increased downtime from costly and dangerous human access

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidoperational productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The computing device performs self-diagnosis and self-restoration through an automated admittance mechanism that monitors system state, identifies faults, and executes recovery procedures without human intervention. The device brings itself to a controlled state, evaluates access requests from software items, and restores normal operation autonomously, eliminating the need for dangerous manual intervention while maintaining system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The computing device proactively brings itself to a controlled state upon detecting a fault, before attempting restoration. This preliminary action prepares the system in advance for safe software item access, ensuring that restoration operations can be performed quickly and safely without waiting for human intervention, thereby minimizing downtime and maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If software items are allowed to access computing devices without strict control, then ease of operation increases, but system integrity and security deteriorate due to potential rule violations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess easeVSAvoidsystem integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The computing device acts as an intermediary between software items and the controlled environment. It receives access requests from software items, evaluates them against stored rules, and selectively grants or denies access. This intermediary function enables automated control while maintaining system integrity, as the device mediates all interactions and ensures rule compliance before allowing any software item to access the controlled environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If a dynamic rule-based admittance mechanism is implemented, then system security and integrity are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem integrityVSAvoidcontrol mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The computing device stores copies of rules in its memory that were originally defined by operators or administrators. Instead of requiring complex real-time rule evaluation logic, the device copies and caches these rules for efficient local evaluation. This copying approach simplifies the control mechanism while maintaining comprehensive rule-based security, as the device can quickly compare access requests against stored rule copies without complex processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS11874938B2Admittance mechanism
Publication Date: 2024.01.16 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US11874938B2 patent drawing
  • US11874938B2 patent drawing
  • US11874938B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One embodiment is a first computing system configured to control a second computing system, a software module configured to attempt to interact with the second computing system once the second computing system is brought to a first state by the first computing system, and an admittance mechanism configured to determine if the interaction is allowed to occur.