ADRC Thermal Zone Control for Datacenter Cooling Fluctuations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The rapid growth of datacenters and increased computing infrastructure density have made it challenging to provide effective cooling, leading to higher cooling costs and thermal management issues, such as thermal throttling of processors and storage drives.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of an active disturbance rejection thermal control (ADRC) system that uses extended state observers to estimate temperature and disturbances, generating control signals for cooling elements to maintain target temperatures across multiple thermal zones, thereby improving thermal management efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If computing infrastructure density is increased to drive datacenter growth, then productivity and data processing capability are improved, but thermal management difficulty and cooling costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata processing capabilityVSAvoidthermal management difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The datacenter is divided into multiple thermal zones with dedicated ADRC controllers for each zone. This segmentation allows independent thermal management of different regions, enabling precise control of cooling resources and reducing overall thermal management complexity despite increased computing density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The ADRC controller implements continuous feedback control by monitoring temperature measurements from thermal zones and adjusting cooling element outputs accordingly. The extended state observer estimates disturbances and temperature states in real-time, creating a closed-loop feedback system that automatically adapts to thermal changes caused by high-density computing workloads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Temperature

If cooling capacity is increased to manage thermal loads from high-density servers, then temperature control is improved, but energy consumption and cooling costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal control precisionVSAvoidcooling energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling system transitions from static to dynamic control through the ADRC controller, which continuously adjusts cooling element outputs based on real-time temperature measurements and disturbance estimates. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to provide precise temperature control only when and where needed, reducing unnecessary cooling energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes cooling parameters (output control signals) based on varying thermal conditions and workload disturbances. The extended state observer estimates disturbance parameters in real-time, allowing the controller to adapt cooling intensity dynamically, thereby maintaining temperature control precision while minimizing energy consumption during low-thermal-load periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If conventional thermal control methods are used in high-density datacenters, then system simplicity is maintained, but thermal throttling and performance degradation occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system simplicityVSAvoidprocessor performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The extended state observer acts as an intermediary that estimates unmeasured thermal states and disturbances, providing this information to the ADRC controller. This intermediary component enables sophisticated thermal management without requiring direct measurement of all thermal parameters, maintaining system simplicity while preventing thermal throttling through proactive control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The ADRC controller with extended state observer performs preliminary thermal management by estimating future thermal states and disturbances before they cause critical temperature rises. This proactive approach prevents thermal throttling by adjusting cooling outputs in advance, maintaining processor performance without requiring overly complex measurement and control infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12197259B2Active disturbance rejection based thermal control
Publication Date: 2025.01.14 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US12197259B2 patent drawing
  • US12197259B2 patent drawing
  • US12197259B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for active disturbance rejection based thermal control is configured to receive, at a first active disturbance rejection thermal control (ADRC) controller, a first temperature measurement from a first thermal zone. The ADRC controller generates a first output control signal for controlling a first cooling element, wherein the first output control signal is generated according a first estimated temperature and a first estimated disturbance calculated by a first extended state observer (ESO) of the first ADRC controller.