ADS Safety Policy Mapping for Targeted Road Data Collection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Ensuring the safety requirements of Autonomous Driving Systems (ADS) are effectively proven, particularly in the absence and presence of faults, remains a significant challenge due to the complexity of modeling and predicting their behavior, which hinders widespread market adoption.

Innovation Solution

An ADS development system that derives parameter-specific safe driving policies based on safety requirements and operational parameters, identifies uncertainties that need further observation, and generates mappings associating geographical locations with operational parameters requiring further data collection to relax safety requirements, thereby optimizing performance and data collection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If more data collection and operational hours are gathered to improve ADS performance and safety proof, then safety requirement fulfilment is improved, but development time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety requirement fulfilmentVSAvoiddevelopment time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by proactively identifying operational parameters with high uncertainty and their associated geographical locations before full-scale data collection begins. The mapping generation and uncertainty analysis are conducted in advance to guide targeted data collection efforts, rather than collecting data uniformly across all operational parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the operational parameters into distinct categories based on their uncertainty levels and impact on safety requirements. By identifying specific parameters that need further observance and mapping them to particular geographical locations, the system divides the complex data collection task into manageable, targeted segments rather than treating all parameters uniformly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If comprehensive modeling of ADS behavior is performed to prove safety, then safety proof reliability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety proof reliabilityVSAvoidmodeling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and focuses only on the critical operational parameters that have high uncertainty and significant impact on safety requirements. By identifying and isolating these key parameters rather than modeling all possible ADS behaviors comprehensively, the system reduces modeling complexity while maintaining safety proof reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies local quality by treating different operational parameters differently based on their specific characteristics. Parameters with high uncertainty and high impact receive targeted attention and detailed modeling, while parameters with low uncertainty or low impact are handled more simply. The geographical mapping further localizes the analysis to specific areas where particular parameters need observance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If uniform data collection across all operational parameters is performed, then completeness of safety proof is improved, but resource efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of safety proofVSAvoidresource efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary uncertainty analysis and parameter identification to determine which operational parameters require further observance before initiating data collection. This preliminary action enables resource-efficient targeted collection rather than uniform collection across all parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments operational parameters based on their uncertainty levels and safety impact, then maps them to specific geographical locations. This segmentation enables selective data collection focused on critical parameters in specific areas, improving resource efficiency while maintaining completeness of safety proof.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20240227857A9ADS development
Publication Date: 2024.07.11 ZENSEACT AB
  • US20240227857A9 patent drawing
  • US20240227857A9 patent drawing
  • US20240227857A9 patent drawing

AI summary

A method performed by an Automated Driving Systems (ADS) development system for supporting proving fulfilment of safety requirements imposed on ADSs. The ADS development system derives a corresponding set of parameter-specific ADS safe driving policies, each safe driving policy exhibiting a respective uncertainty. The ADS development system identifies at least a first parameter-specific ADS safe driving policy inflicted with an uncertainty fulfilling predeterminable criteria, which criteria filters out uncertainties indicating, respectively, that the corresponding operational parameter needs to be further observed in order to relax the ADS's currently allowed safety requirements-fulfilled ADS safe driving policy. The ADS development system identifies at least a first geographical location exhibiting conditions allowing the operational parameter(s) in need of further observance, to be observed. The ADS development system generates a mapping associating the identified at least first geographical location with the operational parameter(s) in need of further observance.