Automated Driving Training System for Unnecessary Takeover Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current driver training systems for automated driving systems (ADS) are time-intensive, inconvenient, and ineffective in comprehensively training drivers about ADS capabilities, updates, safety features, and reliability, often leading to unnecessary vehicle takeovers by drivers due to lack of knowledge or training.

Innovation Solution

A training system that generates a projected ADS motion plan during vehicle takeovers, determining if the driver's maneuver differs significantly from the planned motion, and notifies the driver if the takeover was unnecessary, thereby improving confidence and understanding of ADS operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If comprehensive driver training about ADS capabilities is provided through traditional methods (manuals, driving schools, virtual systems), then driver knowledge about ADS improves, but training time and convenience deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver knowledge about ADSVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service training by automatically comparing driver maneuvers with projected ADS motion plans and providing feedback without requiring external training resources. The vehicle itself becomes the training instrument, eliminating the need for manuals, driving schools, or virtual training systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback by notifying drivers when takeovers are unnecessary based on comparison between actual driver maneuvers and projected ADS motion plans. This real-time feedback mechanism replaces traditional one-way information delivery with interactive, situation-specific learning opportunities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If driver training about ADS capabilities and safety features is enhanced, then driver understanding and trust improve, but training effectiveness deteriorates due to lack of comprehensive coverage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver trust in ADSVSAvoidtraining effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system generates projected ADS motion plans in advance to establish a baseline for comparison. By pre-calculating what the ADS would do in various scenarios, the system creates a reference framework that enables immediate evaluation and teaching of ADS capabilities during actual driving situations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides targeted feedback about specific ADS capabilities demonstrated during each driving maneuver, rather than generic training information. This situational feedback directly connects driver actions with ADS responses, improving both understanding and trust in the actual operating context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of information

If the system provides detailed feedback about unnecessary takeovers to improve driver training, then driver understanding of ADS capabilities improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver understanding of ADSVSAvoidtraining system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential comparison between driver maneuvers and projected ADS motion plans, focusing feedback on the core question of whether takeovers were necessary. By isolating this specific comparison, the system avoids the complexity of comprehensive analysis while maintaining effective training.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a simplified copy or representation of the ADS motion plan for comparison purposes, rather than implementing a full-blown simulation or training environment. This copy enables straightforward comparison and feedback without requiring complex training infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS11341866B2Systems and methods for training a driver about automated driving operation
Publication Date: 2022.05.24 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US11341866B2 patent drawing
  • US11341866B2 patent drawing
  • US11341866B2 patent drawing

AI summary

System, methods, and other embodiments described herein relate to improving the training of a driver during automated driving system mode. In one embodiment, a method includes generating, in association with a vehicle takeover and a maneuver by the driver, an automated motion plan associated with the maneuver. The method also includes determining if a difference parameter satisfies a threshold, wherein the difference parameter indicates a disparity between the maneuver by the driver in relation to the automated motion plan associated with the maneuver. The method also includes notifying, if the difference parameter does not satisfy the threshold, the driver that the vehicle takeover and the maneuver by the driver were unnecessary.