Automated Driving Tuning Using Scenario-Based User Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current Automated Driving Systems (ADS) lack personalized tuning parameters, leading to suboptimal user experience and reduced autonomy, as they do not effectively adapt to individual driver preferences and varying environmental scenarios.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing a self-learning model that receives environmental data and user feedback to dynamically set tuning parameters for ADS, such as Adaptive Cruise Control, by determining environmental scenarios and updating the model based on user satisfaction, thereby providing customized settings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional fixed tuning parameters are used in ADS, then system simplicity is maintained, but user satisfaction and adaptability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to user preferencesVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic tuning parameters that automatically adapt to different driving scenarios and user preferences. The system transitions from fixed parameters to dynamically adjustable parameters based on environmental conditions, vehicle state, and learned user preferences, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and complexity through automated dynamic adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs self-learning models that automatically improve tuning parameters without requiring manual user configuration. The ADS learns from user feedback and environmental data to autonomously optimize parameters, eliminating the need for complex manual tuning interfaces while enhancing adaptability to individual user preferences

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If more physical buttons and interactions are provided for parameter adjustment, then user control is improved, but driver workload and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser controlVSAvoidnumber of physical buttons
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces physical buttons and manual adjustment mechanisms with automated electronic systems. The tuning parameter adjustment is performed automatically by the control device based on sensor data and learning models, eliminating the need for physical controls while maintaining ease of operation through invisible automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where user responses to ADS actions are continuously monitored and used to automatically adjust tuning parameters. This feedback mechanism enables the system to learn and adapt to user preferences without requiring explicit manual input, improving ease of operation while minimizing physical interactions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If generic tuning parameters are used for all scenarios, then system simplicity is maintained, but user satisfaction and personalized experience deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization capabilityVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic parameter changes based on detected driving scenarios and user preferences. The system automatically modifies tuning parameters such as acceleration rates, deceleration profiles, and response thresholds to match different environmental conditions and individual user preferences, achieving personalization through automated parameter adaptation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary learning during normal operation to build user preference profiles before specific driving scenarios occur. By continuously gathering and analyzing user feedback data in advance, the system is prepared to provide personalized tuning parameters when needed, enhancing both personalization capability and automation level

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP3693243B1Method and system for controlling an automated driving system of a vehicle
Publication Date: 2024.11.06 ZENUITY AB
  • EP3693243B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3693243B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

A method for setting a tuning parameter for an Automated Driving System (ADS) of a vehicle is disclosed. A corresponding non-transitory computer-readable storage medium, vehicle control device and a vehicle comprising such a control device are also disclosed. The method comprises receiving environmental data from a perception system of the vehicle, said environmental data comprising a plurality of environmental parameters, determining, by means of a self-learning model, an environmental scenario based on the received environmental data;, setting the tuning parameter for the ADS based on the self-learning model and the determined environmental scenario, the tuning parameter defining a dynamic parameter of the ADS, receiving at least one signal representative of a vehicle user feedback on the set tuning parameter, and updating the self-learning model for the set tuning parameter for the identified environmental scenario based on the received vehicle user feedback.