Adsorbent Regeneration Cycle With Unheated Pre-Desorption

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional cyclic adsorptive gas purification processes, particularly thermal swing adsorption (TSA) systems, require significant energy for the regeneration step due to the use of heated regeneration gases, leading to high operational costs and the need for costly mechanical infrastructure.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of an unheated desorption step before the heated desorption step in the regeneration process, utilizing an unheated regeneration gas to partially desorb impurities, thereby reducing the energy required for the subsequent heated desorption step and minimizing overall energy consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If heated regeneration gas is used to regenerate the adsorbent, then the adsorbent regeneration effectiveness is improved, but the energy consumption increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadsorbent regeneration effectivenessVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The regeneration process is divided into multiple sequential steps: depressurization, unheated desorption, heated desorption, cooling, and repressurization. This segmentation allows the use of heated gas only when necessary (during heated desorption) rather than continuously, reducing overall energy consumption while maintaining regeneration effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The depressurization step is performed before heated desorption to create a pressure differential that facilitates impurity removal. This preliminary action reduces the workload for subsequent heated desorption, allowing for lower heating temperatures and reduced energy input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If heated regeneration gas is used to regenerate the adsorbent, then the adsorbent regeneration effectiveness is improved, but the mechanical infrastructure cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadsorbent regeneration effectivenessVSAvoidmechanical infrastructure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The regeneration cycle is segmented into distinct phases with different temperature requirements. Only the heated desorption phase requires heating infrastructure, while other phases use ambient temperature gas flow. This reduces the overall thermal infrastructure needed compared to continuous heated regeneration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the feed gas itself (after depressurization) as the regeneration gas medium, eliminating the need for separate heated gas generation systems. The process leverages existing system components rather than requiring additional dedicated heating infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If the regeneration gas flows counter current to feed gas flow, then the desorption efficiency is improved, but the energy loss increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesorption efficiencyVSAvoidenergy loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

Depressurization is performed as a preliminary step before counter-current desorption. This creates favorable pressure conditions that enhance desorption efficiency during the counter-current flow, reducing the temperature differential needed and thereby reducing energy loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces energy usage in the regeneration state while maintaining effective impurity removal, potentially allowing for smaller heat exchangers and lower operating costs, and can be implemented in existing systems without significant capital expenditures.

Implementation Method 1

The adsorbed impurities in the PSA are desorbed due to the lower adsorptive capacity at lower pressures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDesorption: Desorption

Implementation Method 2

pressure swing adsorption (PSA) systems

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure swing adsorption: Pressure Swing Adsorption

Implementation Method 3

The adsorbent has a lower adsorptive capacity at higher temperature. The heated regeneration gas heats the adsorbent and facilitates regeneration of the adsorbent by desorption of impurities

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDesorption: Desorption

Implementation Method 4

temperature swing adsorption (TSA) systems

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTemperature swing adsorption:

Implementation Method 5

A given adsorbent selectively adsorbs one or more impurities present in the feed gas stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentUS10105637B2Adsorbent regeneration method
Publication Date: 2018.10.23 PRAXAIR TECH INC
  • US10105637B2 patent drawing
  • US10105637B2 patent drawing
  • US10105637B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a cyclic adsorptive gas purification process, an impurity laden adsorbent is regenerated by exposing it first to an unheated gas for a pre-determined time period to desorb at least some of the impurity, followed by heating the adsorbent using a flowing stream of a heated gas to desorb the remaining impurities over another pre-determined time period, further followed by cooling of the adsorbent using a flowing stream of gas for yet another pre-determined time period to make it ready for repeating the adsorptive cycle. Introducing an unheated purge stream reduces the energy requirements for the regeneration step compared to a traditional TSA process.