Advection Model Correction for Weather Prediction Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional weather prediction systems are ineffective in predicting abrupt growth of cumulonimbus clouds due to long time intervals in observation data acquisition, leading to a loss in prediction reliability.

Innovation Solution

A weather prediction apparatus that receives frequent weather observation data from radar sites and a weather data server, uses an advection model to calculate predictions every 10 seconds, and continuously corrects the model based on differences between observation and prediction values to improve accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If observation data is acquired at long time intervals, then the system complexity is reduced, but the prediction accuracy deteriorates due to loss of information about abrupt atmospheric changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs continuous prediction calculations at fixed time intervals using an advection model, maintaining uninterrupted monitoring of atmospheric changes. This continuous operation ensures that even with less frequent observation data, the system captures abrupt changes in cumulonimbus cloud development without gaps, resolving the contradiction between reduced observation frequency and maintained prediction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system compares prediction results with actual observation data and uses the differences to correct the advection model parameters. This feedback mechanism allows the system to adapt to changing atmospheric conditions and maintain high prediction accuracy even when observation data is acquired at longer intervals, as the model continuously learns from observed deviations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Use of energy by moving object

If observation data acquisition interval is increased, then the data processing load is reduced, but the reliability of prediction information is lost due to differences between observation and prediction data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata processing loadVSAvoidreliability of prediction information
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system establishes a feedback loop where prediction results are continuously compared with observation data, and the advection model is corrected based on the differences. This feedback mechanism maintains reliability by ensuring the model adapts to actual atmospheric conditions, compensating for the reduced frequency of observation data acquisition and processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the advection model parameters based on the comparison between prediction and observation data. By changing the model parameters to match actual atmospheric conditions, the system maintains reliable predictions even with reduced data processing loads from less frequent observations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If frequent observation data is acquired, then the prediction accuracy is improved, but the device complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoiddata processing requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains continuous prediction calculations at fixed intervals using the advection model, ensuring that high prediction accuracy is achieved through uninterrupted atmospheric monitoring. This continuous operation allows the system to capture rapid changes in cumulonimbus clouds without requiring proportionally increased observation frequency, thus avoiding excessive data processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The advection model automatically corrects itself by comparing its predictions with observation data and adjusting its parameters accordingly. This self-correction mechanism reduces the need for complex external processing and intervention, allowing the system to maintain high prediction accuracy with manageable data processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the accuracy of short-time weather predictions, effectively predicting abrupt cloud formations and other atmospheric phenomena like precipitation distribution.

Implementation Method 1

an advection model calculation unit that sets the observation value as an initial value, and calculates a prediction value of each grid that corresponds to the spatial resolution of the radar using an advection model

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdvection: Advection

Data Source

PatentEP2818899B1Meteorological forecasting device and meteorological forecasting method
Publication Date: 2017.09.20 TOSHIBA INFRASTRUCTE SYSTEMS & SOLUTIONS CORPORATION
  • EP2818899B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2818899B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2818899B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A weather prediction apparatus according to an embodiment is an apparatus for dividing a prediction target area into grids and performing weather prediction for each grid and includes a communication processing unit (12) configured to receive an observation value in each grid at a first time interval, an advection model calculation unit (14) configured to set a first observation value received by the communication processing unit (12) as an initial value and calculate a prediction value in each grid using an advection model at a second time interval shorter than the first time interval, and an advection model correction unit (15) configured to, when the communication processing unit (12) receives a second observation value after the first observation value, correct the advection model based on a difference between the second observation value and the prediction value corresponding to an observation time of the second observation value.