Adversarial Learning Model with Confidence-Weighted Loss Filter

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing TRADES method faces challenges in improving generalization performance for adversarial examples, as the loss function is not approximated to a sufficiently low upper bound, leading to deteriorated performance.

Innovation Solution

A learning apparatus that acquires data for predicting labels and learns a model representing a probability distribution using a correct answer label as a filter to correctly predict labels for adversarial examples, with specific loss functions like '1+loss' and 'p+loss' to minimize the loss function and enhance robustness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If TRADES method uses loss function approximation to defend against adversarial attacks, then robustness against adversarial examples is improved, but generalization performance deteriorates due to insufficiently low upper bound approximation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobustness against adversarial examplesVSAvoidgeneralization performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the loss function parameters by introducing a filtering mechanism that selectively weights different loss components. The filter parameter α is dynamically adjusted based on prediction confidence, changing the effective parameters of the loss function to achieve better balance between robustness and generalization without requiring loose upper bound approximation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic filtering of the loss function based on the model's prediction confidence. When the model is confident about its prediction, the filter reduces the influence of the adversarial loss term. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to adaptively balance between robustness and natural accuracy, avoiding the static trade-off limitations of traditional TRADES approximation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If loss function is approximated to upper bound for calculation simplicity, then computational efficiency is improved, but approximation accuracy is insufficient leading to performance deterioration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidloss function approximation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by selectively computing the full loss function only for samples where the model is uncertain about its prediction. For confident predictions, the system uses a simplified evaluation. This partial computation approach maintains computational efficiency while improving approximation accuracy where it matters most - in the uncertain regions that drive learning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20230325710A1Learning device, learning method and learning program
Publication Date: 2023.10.12 NT T INC
  • US20230325710A1 patent drawing
  • US20230325710A1 patent drawing
  • US20230325710A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An acquisition unit acquires data for which a label is to be predicted. A learning unit learns a model representing a probability distribution of a label of the acquired data by using, as a filter, a correct answer label of the data so as to correctly predict a label for an adversarial example in which noise is added to the data.