Adversarial Training for Object Detection Robustness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing object detection systems are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, which can significantly impact critical applications like surveillance and autonomous driving, and there is a lack of effective methods to improve their robustness against such attacks.

Innovation Solution

The approach involves categorizing and analyzing different attacks on object detectors, highlighting the interactions between task losses, and generalizing the adversarial training framework from classification to detection, using a minimax formulation with task-oriented domain constraints to generate adversarial examples that improve the robustness of object detection models.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If standard object detection models are used, then detection speed and accuracy on clean images are maintained, but vulnerability to adversarial attacks increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobustness against adversarial attacksVSAvoidtraining complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing adversarial training before deployment. Adversarial examples are generated and used to train the object detection model in advance, so that when the model encounters adversarial inputs during actual use, it has already been exposed to similar attacks and developed resistance. This preliminary exposure to adversarial conditions resolves the contradiction by building robustness beforehand without requiring complex runtime defenses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If adversarial training is implemented, then robustness against attacks is improved, but training time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobustness against adversarial attacksVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the skipping principle by using efficient adversarial attack algorithms that can quickly generate adversarial examples without requiring excessive computational resources. The method uses projected gradient descent (PGD) with a limited number of steps and early stopping criteria, allowing the adversarial training process to rush through the necessary iterations without wasting excessive time. This resolves the contradiction by achieving sufficient robustness through streamlined, time-efficient adversarial example generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

3Reliability

If stronger adversarial attacks are used during training, then robustness is improved, but detection performance on clean images may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobustness against adversarial attacksVSAvoiddetection accuracy on clean images
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by carefully adjusting the attack strength parameter (epsilon) and the number of attack steps during adversarial training. By modifying these parameters, the system finds an optimal balance where adversarial examples are strong enough to improve robustness but not so strong that they cause overfitting or degrade performance on clean images. This resolves the contradiction by dynamically tuning attack parameters to achieve both robustness and maintained detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11037025B2Systems and methods for adversarially robust object detection
Publication Date: 2021.06.15 BAIDU USA LLC
  • US11037025B2 patent drawing
  • US11037025B2 patent drawing
  • US11037025B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described herein are embodiments for an approach to improve the robustness of an object detector against adversarial attacks. Existing attacks for object detectors and the impacts of individual task component on model robustness are systematically analyzed from a multi-task view of object detection. In one or more embodiments, a multi-task learning perspective of object detection is introduced and an asymmetric role of task losses is identified. One or more embodiments of an adversarial training method for robust object detection are presented to leverage the multiple sources of attacks for improving the robustness of object detection models.