Advertising Budget Allocation Optimization via Test Mixture Ratios

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Advertisers face challenges in determining optimal advertising budget allocations across different channels, especially when historical data is lacking for new channels or products, leading to suboptimal return-on-investment.

Innovation Solution

The method involves defining an advertising mixture space, determining test advertising mixture ratios, and selecting a preferred ratio based on performance measures to optimize budget allocation across channels such as search, display, and content media.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If historical advertising data is used to determine budget allocation, then return-on-investment can be optimized for established channels, but the approach becomes ineffective for new channels or products without historical data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereturn-on-investmentVSAvoidapplicability to new channels
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary testing by allocating test budgets to new advertising channels before full-scale deployment. This allows performance data to be collected in advance, enabling data-driven decisions for new channels without relying on historical data that doesn't exist yet.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the approach from relying on historical performance parameters to using test-period performance parameters. By shifting the time parameter from historical to contemporary testing, the system can evaluate both established and new channels using the same performance-based methodology.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If advertising budget is allocated based on past performance, then established advertising channels can be optimized, but the system cannot accommodate new advertising channels or products

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadvertising campaign performanceVSAvoidflexibility for new channels
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from a static allocation model based on historical data to a dynamic model that continuously adapts based on test-period performance. This allows the budget allocation to be optimized for established channels while simultaneously accommodating and evaluating new channels on equal footing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where test-period performance measures are fed back into the budget allocation decision. This closed-loop approach allows continuous optimization for both established and new channels, with performance data from any channel informing future allocation decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of information

If multiple advertising channels are tested simultaneously, then comprehensive performance data can be collected, but the complexity of determining optimal budget allocation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance data completenessVSAvoidallocation determination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the advertising channels into distinct test units, each evaluated independently during the test period. This segmentation allows comprehensive performance data collection for each channel while simplifying the overall analysis by treating each channel's performance as a separate, comparable metric that feeds into the automated optimization algorithm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9721272B2Determining advertisement channel mixture ratios
Publication Date: 2017.08.01 GOOGLE LLC
  • US9721272B2 patent drawing
  • US9721272B2 patent drawing
  • US9721272B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer program products, for determining a mixture ratio for allocating portions of an advertising budget among different advertising channels (e.g., print, online, radio, television) to optimize a performance measure, such as cost-per-action. A mixture space is used to define the available advertising channels and any constraints placed on those channels, such as no more than fifty percent of the advertising budget being allocated to a particular channel, and test mixture ratios are selected according to an optimality criterion. The selected test mixture ratios are used during a testing period on live traffic. The performance measures from the test mixture ratios are used to select a preferred mixture ratio from the mixture space.