Advocacy Filtering via User Influence Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current online social media platforms lack an intelligent mechanism to effectively track and promote advocacy among users, particularly for brands, as only a small percentage of fans actively advocate for brands beyond liking their social media pages, and there is a need to identify and engage true brand advocates within their fan base.

Innovation Solution

An online community advocacy management platform that filters and promotes user-generated content based on advocate levels, trend rates, and recent activity, using algorithms to gauge the likelihood of future influence and provide incentives for users to become influential advocates, while also allowing brands to evaluate and reward user-generated content.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional social networking platforms allow unrestricted user-generated content sharing, then user participation and content volume increase, but the ability to identify and promote true brand advocates deteriorates due to lack of intelligent filtering mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser participationVSAvoidadvocate identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where user actions (likes, shares, comments) generate data that feeds into advocacy scoring algorithms. These scores then determine content promotion and user engagement strategies, creating a continuous improvement cycle for identifying true advocates while maintaining high participation levels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual content review and advocate identification with automated algorithmic systems that analyze user behavior patterns, engagement metrics, and content performance to objectively measure and promote brand advocacy at scale

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the platform promotes all user-generated content equally, then content diversity increases, but the effectiveness of brand advocacy promotion deteriorates due to lack of intelligent selection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent diversityVSAvoidbrand advocacy effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different promotion strategies to different users based on their calculated advocacy scores and content quality metrics. High-value advocate content receives prioritized promotion while maintaining overall content diversity, ensuring that brand advocacy effectiveness is enhanced without eliminating content variety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If the platform implements comprehensive tracking of user actions, then advocate identification accuracy improves, but system complexity and data processing requirements worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadvocate identification accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments user actions into categorized events (likes, shares, comments, clicks) with associated weights, and processes these segmented data points through modular scoring algorithms. This segmentation enables comprehensive tracking while maintaining system manageability and computational efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Measurement precision

If the platform provides detailed insights and filtering options, then brand evaluation capability improves, but ease of operation deteriorates due to increased interface complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrand evaluation capabilityVSAvoidinterface simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides comprehensive filtering and analysis capabilities, but implements default views that show only the most relevant advocate content and key metrics. Users can access detailed filtering options when needed, but the default interface remains simple and easy to operate, applying partial action to maintain usability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9473584B2Contribution filtering for online community advocacy management platform
Publication Date: 2016.10.18 SULLIVAN DANIEL
  • US9473584B2 patent drawing
  • US9473584B2 patent drawing
  • US9473584B2 patent drawing

AI summary

For an online community advocacy management platform, the techniques herein intelligently provide mechanisms and user interfaces for filtering (triaging) the view of comments and content based on advocate levels, trend rates, consumer participation, hot topics, recent activity, etc. by gauging the likelihood of user-generated actions to cause future influence based on their algorithmic similarities to historically influential actions, and weighted based on an aggregate, compounding history of individuals throughout time.