Acoustic Emission Sensor Verification Using Controlled Signal Generation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for verifying the operation of acoustic emission sensors lack reproducibility and practicality, often leading to improper assessment of their functionality.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method utilizing an acoustic source, such as a motor or piezoelectric device, to generate an acoustic signal that is measured by the sensor, with a processor comparing the signal to a baseline to determine the sensor's operational condition, ensuring accurate characterization of the sensor's status.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a pencil lead break test is used to verify acoustic emission sensor functionality, then the test can be performed with simple materials, but the reproducibility and measurement precision are insufficient leading to improper assessment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of test setupVSAvoidreproducibility of sensor verification
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical parameters of the test by using a controlled acoustic source that generates specific acoustic signals with known characteristics (frequency, amplitude, duration) rather than relying on random pencil lead breaks. This allows for precise control and reproduction of test conditions while maintaining simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical pencil lead break method with an acoustic source that generates controlled acoustic signals. This substitution provides more reliable and reproducible test results while maintaining ease of implementation through automated signal generation and evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If piezoelectric sensors in reciprocity mode are used for verification, then the test can assess sensor functionality, but the complexity and difficulty of proper implementation increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of sensor functionality assessmentVSAvoidcomplexity of verification system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a universal acoustic source that can generate various acoustic signals for different verification purposes. The same acoustic source and evaluation system can assess different aspects of sensor functionality, making the system versatile and reducing overall complexity compared to multiple specialized test systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the acoustic emission sensor itself to detect and evaluate acoustic signals during the verification process. The sensor being tested actively participates in its own verification by detecting the acoustic signals and providing data for assessment, eliminating the need for separate complex verification sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If manual operator assessment is used for sensor verification, then the test can be performed with minimal equipment, but the consistency and reliability of assessment deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of test executionVSAvoidconsistency of sensor functionality assessment
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements an automated feedback system where acoustic signals are generated, the sensor detects these signals, and the system automatically evaluates the sensor's response. This closed-loop feedback mechanism provides consistent, objective assessment results that are not dependent on operator judgment or variability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual operator assessment with an automated electronic evaluation system. The system automatically generates acoustic signals, measures sensor responses, and determines sensor functionality based on predefined criteria, eliminating human variability and improving consistency while maintaining ease of operation through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach provides a cost-effective and accurate method for assessing the operational status of acoustic emission sensors, reducing the risk of improper assessment and enabling reliable data collection.

Implementation Method 1

an acoustic source acoustically coupled to a device, where the acoustic source is to generate an acoustic signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic signal generation and propagation: Sound

Implementation Method 2

measuring, at an acoustic emission sensor that is operatively coupled to the device, the acoustic signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic emission detection: Acoustic Emission

Data Source

PatentUS10345273B2Methods and apparatus to verify operation of acoustic emission sensors
Publication Date: 2019.07.09 FISHER CONTROLS INT LLC
  • US10345273B2 patent drawing
  • US10345273B2 patent drawing
  • US10345273B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatus verify operation of acoustic emission sensors are disclosed. A disclosed example apparatus includes an acoustic source acoustically coupled to a device, where the acoustic source is to generate an acoustic signal, and a processor to determine an operational condition of an acoustic emission sensor associated with the device based on measuring the generated acoustic signal at the acoustic emission sensor.