AEC Risk Analysis System Using ML for Issue Prioritization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Construction sites face challenges in managing and prioritizing numerous project issues in real-time, as team leaders struggle to identify critical risks and their impact on construction projects, leading to inefficiencies in resource allocation and project progression.

Innovation Solution

A system combining machine learning models with data from mobile devices, drones, cameras, and sensors to analyze and visualize risk metrics across projects and subcontractors, providing interactive visualizations and feedback loops to enhance risk management and decision-making.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If supervisors manually review long lists of construction issues, then they can identify critical risks using human knowledge, but it consumes an entire day and reduces productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk identification accuracyVSAvoidissue review efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical manual review process with an automated machine learning system that uses natural language processing and classification algorithms to analyze construction issues, thereby maintaining risk identification accuracy while dramatically improving review efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary machine learning model that acts as a bridge between raw construction issue data and supervisor decision-making, automatically prioritizing issues based on learned patterns from historical data while allowing supervisors to focus on critical decisions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If machine learning models automatically prioritize risks, then productivity increases and time is reduced, but the system lacks the contextual understanding of human supervisors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk analysis speedVSAvoidrisk assessment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback loops where supervisor corrections and validations of automated risk prioritization are fed back into the machine learning model, continuously improving its accuracy and contextual understanding while maintaining high productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges automated machine learning risk prioritization with human supervisor expertise by allowing interactive adjustment of risk scores and incorporating supervisor feedback, thereby combining the speed of automation with the contextual understanding of human experts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Measurement precision

If the system analyzes all construction issues comprehensively, then measurement precision improves, but the complexity of the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk metric accuracyVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex risk analysis system into modular components including data ingestion modules, machine learning modeling modules, visualization modules, and feedback processing modules, allowing comprehensive analysis while managing complexity through organized separation of concerns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11663545B2Architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) risk analysis system and method
Publication Date: 2023.05.30 AUTODESK INC
  • US11663545B2 patent drawing
  • US11663545B2 patent drawing
  • US11663545B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method provide the ability to control an architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) project workflow. AEC data regarding a quality of construction is obtained. A set of classifiers and machine learning models are obtained. The AEC data is augmented based on the set of classifiers and machine learning models. A risk metric is generated for one or more issues in the AEC data based on the augmented AEC data. The risk metric is interactively generated and presented on a display device. Work, project resourcing, and/or training are prioritized based on the risk metric.