Aerated Pad Compost System with Pivot Arm and Water Reuse

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Large-scale compost facilities face inefficiencies due to high labor and energy requirements for handling bulk materials, compaction issues, odor management, and space utilization, which hinder economic operation and biological composting activity.

Innovation Solution

A compost system incorporating a pivot arm with an aerated pad, air handling, and water collection systems, featuring automated components and sensors controlled by a computer module to reduce operator time, enhance land use intensity, improve biological activity, minimize odor production, and reuse water, thereby optimizing material handling and processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If front end loaders are used to handle bulk materials, then material handling capability is improved, but capital cost and compaction of bulk materials increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial handling capabilityVSAvoidcapital cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables bulk materials to be handled and moved by their own weight and the processing equipment itself, rather than requiring separate front end loaders. The aerated static pile system allows materials to be processed in place, eliminating the need for additional material handling equipment and reducing capital costs while maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts the material handling function from the system by eliminating front end loaders entirely. Instead of using loaders to move materials, the system processes materials in fixed aerated piles, removing the harmful element (loaders that cause compaction and high capital cost) while preserving the essential material processing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Productivity

If front end loaders are used to handle bulk materials, then material handling capability is improved, but bulk material compaction increases impairing biologic composting activity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial handling capabilityVSAvoidbiologic composting activity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system allows bulk materials to be processed in place through the aerated static pile method, where materials aerate and compost themselves without requiring front end loaders that cause compaction. This self-processing approach maintains porosity and biologic activity while achieving material handling objectives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention removes front end loaders from the system entirely, extracting the harmful compaction effect while preserving material processing capability through alternative in-place aeration and composting methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Area of stationary object

If aerated static piles are used, then space efficiency is improved, but placement and removal of aeration pipes becomes labor intensive and cumbersome

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace efficiencyVSAvoidaeration pipe placement and removal
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system allows aerated static piles to function with permanent or semi-permanent aeration infrastructure that requires minimal intervention. Once pipes are installed, the system operates autonomously without requiring frequent placement and removal of aeration components, reducing labor intensity while maintaining space efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The aeration infrastructure is installed in advance and remains in place for extended periods, allowing multiple composting cycles to occur without repeated installation and removal of aeration pipes. This preliminary setup eliminates the labor-intensive repetitive task of pipe placement and removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Object-generated harmful factors

If biofilters are used to treat air from aerated composting piles, then odor reduction is improved, but area requirements and maintenance needs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveodor reductionVSAvoidarea requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The aerated static pile system inherently reduces odors through controlled aeration that promotes aerobic decomposition and prevents anaerobic odor-generating conditions. This self-regulating aeration process reduces odor without requiring additional biofilter infrastructure, thereby reducing area requirements while maintaining odor control effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system converts the potential harmful effect of odors into a benefit by using controlled aeration to promote aerobic decomposition, which naturally suppresses odor-generating anaerobic conditions. This transforms the odor problem into a self-solving feature of the aeration process itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system significantly reduces operator time and power usage, increases land use efficiency, enhances biological activity, minimizes odor production, and effectively reuses water, leading to a more economical and efficient composting process.

Implementation Method 1

Aerated static piles comprise air pipes beneath piles of bulk material. Aerated static piles improve space efficiency and may provide continuous aeration.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAeration: Aeration

Implementation Method 2

Biofilters may be used to treat air that is suctioned from aerated composting piles to reduce odors.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOdor treatment:

Implementation Method 3

Most composting facilities cannot discharge untreated stormwater or leachate, so retention ponds with aeration treatment systems are used.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWater reuse:

Data Source

PatentUS10414696B2Bulk material compost system
Publication Date: 2019.09.17 GREEN MOUNTAIN TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US10414696B2 patent drawing
  • US10414696B2 patent drawing
  • US10414696B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, apparatus, and system for a compost system to reduce operator time, reduce power utilization, increase intensity of land use by the compost system, increase efficiency of biological activity in bulk material composted by the compost system, reduce odor production by the compost system, and to reuse water applied to and which may leach out of bulk material. The compost system may comprise an aerated pad, a pivot arm attached to a center of the aerated pad, and a control module. The aerated pad may receive a bulk material to be composted into a compost product. The aerated pad may comprise an air nozzle and a drain to direct water from the bulk material to a water collection system. The pivot arm may deposit the bulk material on the aerated pad. The control module may manage a temperature inside the bulk material using the air nozzle.