Automated Property Damage Assessment via Aerial Zoning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for inspecting and estimating damage to buildings after disasters are inefficient and costly, requiring multiple physical inspections by different analysts and companies, which can be time-consuming and expensive, especially for widespread damage across large areas.

Innovation Solution

A network-based guideline management system that automates the inspection and estimation process by zoning damaged areas, managing guidelines, and assigning qualified inspectors to create scopes of repair, ensuring compliance with insurance company rules and policies, and facilitating efficient communication and data sharing among stakeholders.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple analysts from different repair companies physically inspect each damaged property, then comprehensive damage assessment and repair estimates can be obtained, but the process becomes enormously time-consuming and expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage assessment accuracyVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses aerial imagery and photogrammetry to create accurate 3D models and damage assessments of properties without requiring physical inspectors to visit each location. This copying approach allows multiple repair companies to analyze the same high-quality digital models, obtaining comprehensive damage assessment data without the time and cost of multiple physical inspections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a universal digital dataset (aerial imagery and 3D models) that can be used by multiple repair companies and insurance adjusters simultaneously. This single universal resource serves the function of multiple individual inspections, allowing all stakeholders to perform their assessments from the same accurate data source.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If multiple analysts from different repair companies physically inspect each damaged property, then comprehensive repair estimates can be generated, but the process becomes enormously expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverepair estimate accuracyVSAvoidinspection cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive physical inspection trips by multiple companies with a single set of aerial imagery and 3D models that all companies can access. This copying approach maintains repair estimate accuracy while dramatically reducing the cumulative cost of travel, time, and resources required for multiple physical inspections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system discards the traditional model of repeated physical inspections and recovers value through a single comprehensive aerial survey that serves all inspection needs. The high initial investment in aerial imaging is recovered many times over as it replaces numerous individual inspection costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Measurement precision

If permission is obtained to physically access each damaged property for inspection, then accurate damage assessment can be performed, but the process becomes exhausting and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage assessment accuracyVSAvoidinspection accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of physical property access and human inspection with an aerial imaging system that captures imagery from above. This substitution eliminates the need for permission to access properties, as the aerial survey can image properties from public airspace, making the inspection process vastly easier and more accessible.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The aerial imagery and 3D models serve as an intermediary between the inspector and the property. Instead of requiring direct physical access to the property, the intermediary digital models provide all necessary inspection data, facilitating easy and non-intrusive assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If extensive testing or demolition is performed to determine structural damage, then complete understanding of damage scope can be achieved, but the process becomes impossibly time-consuming and destructive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural damage detectionVSAvoidtesting complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses photogrammetry and 3D modeling to create accurate digital copies of building structures and their damage. This allows for virtual analysis of structural integrity and damage scope without requiring physical testing or demolition, achieving comprehensive understanding while avoiding the complexity and destructiveness of extensive field testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20240412296A1Systems and methods for automating property damage event response workflow
Publication Date: 2024.12.12 ACCURENCE INC
  • US20240412296A1 patent drawing
  • US20240412296A1 patent drawing
  • US20240412296A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a method and system for automating emergency event response. Information associated with an event is received via a network connection. An extent of impact of the event is determined. A location of the impact of the event is determined. One or more geographical zones associated with the event are determined based on the determination of the extent of impact and the determination of the location of the impact. Each of the geographical zones is associated with a different section portion of the geographical area. A first physical property of one or more physical properties is determined to qualify for contractor inspection based on a location of each of one or more physical properties and a determined access level for geographical zone relative to the location. A customer inspection workflow associated with the first physical property is transmitted to a user device associated with a contractor.