Aerial Image Registration Error Determination via Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current position measuring devices in lithography are unable to achieve the required accuracy for registration error determination, particularly with metrological requirements exceeding 1 nm, due to limitations in existing methods for subpixel-accurate position determination and the influence of distortions in aerial image generation.

Innovation Solution

The method involves capturing a first aerial image and simulating a second aerial image based on pattern specifications of the mask, accounting for distortion effects such as proximity effects, lens distortions, and mask topography, to accurately determine the registration error by comparing the positions of features in both images.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional subpixel-accurate position determination methods are used, then measurement capability is provided, but measurement precision is insufficient for requirements below 1 nm

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregistration error determination accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement reliability under distortion influence
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a simulated aerial image that copies the expected pattern appearance based on mask design data, then compares this simulated copy with the actual captured aerial image to determine registration errors. This copying approach allows distortion compensation by referencing the known design geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a simulation model as an intermediary between the mask design and the actual measurement. This simulation intermediary accounts for optical distortions and proximity effects, serving as a mediator that translates design intent into expected measurement appearances, enabling accurate registration determination despite physical distortions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If distortion effects are not accounted for in aerial image analysis, then measurement process is simpler, but measurement precision deteriorates due to distortion artifacts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition determination accuracyVSAvoidcomplexity of distortion compensation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary simulation of the aerial image based on mask design data before actual measurement. This preliminary action pre-calculates the expected pattern appearance including all distortion effects, so that when the actual measurement is taken, the comparison can directly yield accurate registration errors without complex real-time distortion correction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical or optical distortion correction mechanisms with a computational simulation approach. Instead of physically compensating for distortions through hardware adjustments, the system uses software-based aerial image simulation to model and account for all distortion effects mathematically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If high-resolution pattern specifications are used for simulation, then measurement precision improves, but computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregistration error determination accuracyVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies simulation only to the specific regions and features relevant to registration measurement, rather than simulating the entire mask at maximum resolution. This partial action approach focuses computational resources on the critical measurement areas, achieving sufficient precision without the full computational burden of complete high-resolution simulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10113864B2Method for determining the registration of a structure on a photomask and apparatus to perform the method
Publication Date: 2018.10.30 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC AG
  • US10113864B2 patent drawing
  • US10113864B2 patent drawing
  • US10113864B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for determining a registration error of a feature on a mask, including providing a first aerial image that was captured by means of a position measuring device and includes at least the feature, simulating, from pattern specifications of the mask, a second aerial image that includes at least the feature, taking into account at least one effect that causes distortion of the first aerial image, and determining the registration error of the feature as the distance of the position of the feature in the first aerial image from the position of the feature in the second aerial image. Also provided is a method for simulating an aerial image from pattern specifications of a mask and a position measuring device for carrying out the method.