Aerial Image Subset Screening for Reliable Geospatial Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems struggle to process third-party geospatial aerial images with varying attributes such as resolution, image quality, coverage, and weather conditions, leading to system failures and resource wastage.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method that assesses geospatial aerial images by determining attributes like resolution, coverage, clarity, and gap/overlap within a selected bounding zone, using a scoring system to accept or reject subsets for image processing based on predefined thresholds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If third-party geospatial aerial images with varying attributes are processed directly, then image coverage and data quantity increase, but system reliability deteriorates due to processing failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage coverageVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by assessing image attributes (resolution, clarity, coverage, gap/overlap) before processing the geospatial aerial images. The system evaluates multiple attributes and generates scores to determine whether images meet quality thresholds, preventing processing failures before they occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by comparing assessed attribute values against predefined thresholds and adjusting image selection accordingly. The scoring mechanism provides feedback on image quality, enabling the system to accept or reject images based on whether they meet minimum quality standards for reliable processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of information

If all received geospatial aerial images are processed, then data completeness improves, but resource utilization deteriorates due to processing low-quality images

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata completenessVSAvoidresource utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies taking out by extracting only the high-quality images that meet predefined attribute thresholds from the complete set of received images. The system assesses each image's attributes and selectively processes only those that satisfy quality requirements, excluding low-quality images from further processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies parameter changes by establishing minimum threshold values for critical attributes (resolution, clarity, coverage, gap/overlap). Images are processed only if their attribute parameters meet or exceed these thresholds, transforming the selection criterion from processing all images to processing only those meeting specific parameter requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If image processing is performed without attribute assessment, then processing speed increases, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to variable image quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidimage processing precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing attribute assessment (resolution, clarity, coverage, gap/overlap) before the actual image processing step. This preliminary evaluation ensures that only images meeting quality standards are processed, guaranteeing processing precision while maintaining efficiency through automated threshold-based selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Manufacturing precision

If attribute assessment and scoring system are implemented, then image processing quality improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage processing qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the image assessment process into distinct attribute evaluations (resolution, clarity, coverage, gap/overlap). Each attribute is assessed independently and scored separately, then combined to determine overall image suitability. This modular approach manages system complexity by breaking down the assessment into manageable components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12548131B2Apparatus and methods for assessing geospatial aerial images for image processing
Publication Date: 2026.02.10 HERE GLOBAL BV
  • US12548131B2 patent drawing
  • US12548131B2 patent drawing
  • US12548131B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus, method and computer program product are provided for assessing geospatial aerial images for image processing. In one example, the apparatus receives a plurality of geospatial aerial images, where each of the plurality of geospatial aerial image data represents a zone within a map. The apparatus selects a bounding zone within the map for image processing and, in response to the bounding zone including a subset of the plurality of geospatial aerial images, the apparatus accepts or rejects the subset for the image processing based on one or more attributes of the subset. The one or more attributes is a resolution of each of the subset, an amount of area within the bounding zone covered by the subset, a clarity of each of the subset, an amount of gap or overlap between the subset, or a combination thereof.