Aerial Imaging for Emergency Response Coordination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current aerial imaging systems lack efficient methods to rapidly respond to emergency events or conditions on the ground, such as vehicle accidents or road hazards, by providing timely and relevant aerial imagery for emergency responders and operators.

Innovation Solution

A system that utilizes aerial imaging devices like satellites, UAVs, and blimps to capture and transmit images in response to alerts from vehicle telematics devices or mobile devices, allowing for real-time or near real-time image processing and analysis to assist in event verification and response, including automatic detection and prioritization of image requests based on event severity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If aerial imaging devices are used to capture images of emergency events, then the availability of aerial imagery for emergency responders is improved, but the response time and speed of delivering images to operators may be insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveavailability of aerial imageryVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-positions multiple aerial imaging devices (satellites, UAVs, blimps) in strategic locations and maintains them in standby mode with active imaging capabilities. When an emergency event is detected via alerts from telematics devices or mobile devices, the nearest available aerial imaging device is immediately dispatched to capture imagery, eliminating deployment delays and ensuring rapid response while maintaining reliable image availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If multiple aerial imaging devices are deployed to cover various locations, then the coverage and availability of aerial imagery is improved, but the complexity of managing and coordinating these devices increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage availabilityVSAvoidsystem coordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A centralized server acts as an intermediary between multiple aerial imaging devices and emergency operators. The server receives alerts from telematics devices and mobile devices, automatically determines the nearest available aerial imaging device, coordinates the image capture request, and delivers the imagery to appropriate operators. This intermediary architecture manages device complexity centrally while maintaining broad coverage and reliable image availability across multiple locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of time

If aerial images are captured and transmitted in real-time or near real-time, then the timeliness of information for emergency responders is improved, but the processing and analysis speed required to extract meaningful information increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetimeliness of informationVSAvoidimage processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the most critical and relevant information from captured aerial images for immediate emergency response. Rather than processing and analyzing entire high-resolution images in detail, the system identifies and extracts key features such as the location, extent, and nature of the emergency event (accident, hazard, etc.), then delivers this extracted information to operators. This selective extraction approach maintains timeliness while reducing the computational burden of full image processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Productivity

If automated detection and prioritization of image requests is implemented, then the efficiency of resource allocation is improved, but the complexity of automated event severity assessment increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation efficiencyVSAvoidautomated assessment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses predefined parameter thresholds and classification criteria to automatically assess event severity and prioritize image requests. Alerts from telematics devices and mobile devices are evaluated against established parameters (e.g., event type, location, detected hazards) that automatically categorize events into severity levels. This parameter-based classification approach enables efficient resource allocation through automated prioritization while keeping the assessment complexity manageable through standardized criteria rather than complex analytical models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9948898B2Using aerial imaging to provide supplemental information about a location
Publication Date: 2018.04.17 VERIZON PATENT & LICENSING INC
  • US9948898B2 patent drawing
  • US9948898B2 patent drawing
  • US9948898B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aerial images, such as images from satellites or other aerial imaging devices, may be used to assist in responding to the occurrence of events (such as vehicle accidents or other emergency events) or conditions. In one implementation, an alert may be received indicating a condition or event associated with a user device. In response, an aerial image associated with the location of the user device may be requested. The alert may be responded to based on the received image. Aerial imaging may also provide views of the road ahead of a driver that terrain, topography, or darkness may otherwise impede. Image recognition may provide analysis of a hazard, condition, or occurrence at a scene that the aerial imaging system has captured and transmitted in response to a request.