Aerial Marker Georeferencing for Ground Movement Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing aerial and satellite-based methods for monitoring ground movement and vegetation overgrowth are limited in precision, requiring expensive equipment and high processing power, and fail to accurately detect small markers or geohazards without post-processing.

Innovation Solution

A system using an aerial vehicle with high-definition cameras or 3D scanning equipment for data capture, combined with GPS and IMU for precise georeferencing, identifies and tracks markers to detect ground movement and vegetation overgrowth, enabling efficient detection of potential geohazards.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If satellite radar imagery is used to monitor ground movement, then large-area coverage is achieved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to inability to identify small markers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage areaVSAvoidmarker identification precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the monitoring task into two levels: satellite radar provides broad area coverage while aerial vehicles with high-resolution cameras provide detailed marker-level precision. This segmentation allows each method to operate in its optimal performance range without compromise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Aerial vehicles serve as an intermediary between satellite radar imagery and ground markers. They capture high-resolution images that enable precise identification and georeferencing of small markers, which satellite radar cannot resolve directly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If LiDAR or remote sensing technologies are used for airborne data collection, then ground surface mapping capability is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveground surface mapping precisionVSAvoidequipment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses aerial vehicles to capture optical images that serve as copies of the ground surface, which are then processed to create digital surface models. This approach achieves accurate mapping without requiring complex LiDAR hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces complex mechanical LiDAR systems with simpler aerial vehicles equipped with cameras and GPS/IMU positioning systems. The mapping is achieved through photogrammetry and image processing rather than direct laser ranging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If aerial images are captured and compared for topographic change detection, then ground movement detection capability is improved, but processing time and computational power increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetopographic change detection precisionVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs georeferencing of markers during the data capture phase using GPS and IMU systems integrated with the aerial vehicle. This preliminary georeferencing reduces the computational burden during subsequent comparison phases, as markers are already positioned in coordinate space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts and tracks specific georeferenced markers from the aerial images rather than processing entire images for change detection. This extraction approach focuses computational resources on key reference points, significantly reducing processing time while maintaining detection precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Measurement precision

If existing aerial inspection systems are used for marker georeferencing, then object detection capability is improved, but ground movement detection capability deteriorates due to lack of temporal comparison

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemarker detection precisionVSAvoidground movement detection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous monitoring by repeatedly capturing aerial images of the same region at different time points. Georeferenced markers are tracked across multiple temporal instances, enabling detection of ground movement through comparison of marker positions over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses georeferenced markers as reference points to detect ground movement. By comparing the expected positions of markers (based on initial georeferencing) with their actual positions in subsequent images, the system provides feedback on ground stability and identifies potential geohazards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides precise georeferencing and movement detection of markers, reducing processing time and costs while effectively identifying ground movement and vegetation overgrowth, facilitating early detection of geohazards.

Implementation Method 1

positioning equipment simultaneously acquiring position data relative to the position and orientation of the aerial vehicle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGPS positioning:

Implementation Method 2

The marker georeferencing module is configured to receive and process the marker identification data and the position data and to georeference at least a portion of the identified at least portions of markers therefrom

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGeoreferencing: Photogrammetry

Implementation Method 3

The movement detection module is configured to receive the marker georeferenced data associated to at least one marker identified based on the mapping data and position data acquired at different points in time and compare the marker georeferenced data of the at least one marker at the different points in time to detect if one of a movement or a movement trend of the at least one marker has occurred

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPosition comparison:

Data Source

PatentUS20260043649A1System and method for georeferencing of markers using aerial vehicle and use of the georeferenced position of the markers for detecting potential movement of the ground and/or overgrowth of vegetation
Publication Date: 2026.02.12 LES SYST FLYSCAN INC
  • US20260043649A1 patent drawing
  • US20260043649A1 patent drawing
  • US20260043649A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for georeferencing of markers and using the georeferenced position of the markers for detecting potential movement of the ground including a data capture subsystem mounted to an aerial vehicle and comprising mapping capture equipment and positioning equipment acquiring respectively mapping data and position data as they move over a region of interest, a marker identification module configured identifying markers located in the region of interest from the mapping data, a marker georeferencing module georeferencing at least a portion of the identified marker, a marker data source receiving and storing the marker georeferenced data, and a movement detection module receiving marker georeferenced data associated to markers identified based on the mapping data and position data acquired at different points in time and compare the marker georeferenced data to detect if a movement or a movement trend of the markers.