Aerial Vehicle Obstacle Detection With Redundant Camera Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for controlling aerial vehicle flight movements are inefficient and unreliable, particularly in detecting and avoiding obstacles, as they rely solely on sensor signals without robust redundancy for accurate identification and collision avoidance.

Innovation Solution

The method employs multiple camera devices for acquiring image data, which undergo redundant analysis using both artificial intelligence and conventional image analysis to determine object parameters for flight obstacles, ensuring accurate identification and transmission of these parameters to a control device for collision avoidance, incorporating pre-processing and visual analysis to maintain field of view integrity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single sensor device is used for obstacle detection, then the device complexity is low, but the reliability of obstacle detection is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle detection reliabilityVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent assigns different detection capabilities to different camera devices - a first camera device for wide-area monitoring and a second camera device for detailed analysis of specific regions. This local differentiation of detection quality enables reliable obstacle detection without requiring all sensors to have maximum complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The obstacle detection function is segmented into multiple independent camera devices, each handling specific detection tasks. The evaluation device then processes data from these segmented sources, allowing the system to achieve high reliability through distributed detection rather than a single complex sensor

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If redundant image analysis with multiple analysis methods is performed, then the measurement precision of obstacle identification is improved, but the processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle identification accuracyVSAvoidimage processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation device performs preliminary filtering and preprocessing of image data before applying complex analysis methods. By preparing and organizing data in advance, the system reduces the time required for subsequent redundant analysis while maintaining identification accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a multi-stage analysis process where obvious obstacles are identified quickly through simpler methods, allowing the system to skip detailed redundant analysis for clearly detected objects while applying thorough analysis only to ambiguous cases, thus reducing overall processing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

Data Source

PatentUS12197235B2Method for controlling a flight movement of an aerial vehicle and aerial vehicle
Publication Date: 2025.01.14 SPLEENLAB GMBH
  • US12197235B2 patent drawing
  • US12197235B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The preferred embodiments pertain to a method for controlling a flight movement of an aerial vehicle that includes acquiring first image data by means of a first camera device that is arranged on an aerial vehicle and configured for monitoring an environment of the aerial vehicle while flying, wherein the first image data are indicative of a first sequence of first camera images. The method also includes acquiring second image data by means of a second camera device that is arranged on an aerial vehicle and configured for monitoring the environment of the aerial vehicle while flying, wherein the second image data are indicative of a second sequence of second camera images. The processing includes determining object parameters for a position of a flight obstacle in the environment of the aerial vehicle if the first image analysis predicts the flight obstacle in the at least one camera measurement image and the second image analysis likewise identifies the flight obstacle in the at least one camera measurement image. An aerial vehicle is furthermore disclosed.