Aerial Payload Ejection System with Stabilizer for Sensor Deployment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing remote unattended sensor and munitions systems require hand emplacement, exposing soldiers to hostile environments and increasing their workload, as they lack efficient methods for autonomous and controlled deployment.

Innovation Solution

A controlled dispense system utilizing an elongated ejection system with axially-displaced ejector bays and a stabilizer to deploy unattended ground components radially, programmed for specific timing sequences to achieve desired coverage patterns, allowing for remote and stable emplacement from aerial vehicles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If hand emplacement is used for unattended sensor and munitions systems, then soldiers can directly control component placement, but soldier workload increases and they are exposed to hostile environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent deployment safetyVSAvoiddeployment efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical emplacement with an automated aerial ejection system. Components are held in ejector bays and discharged through ejection charges that propel them radially outward, eliminating the need for soldiers to manually handle and place components in hostile environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The ejection system is designed to be self-operating once activated. The timing sequence automatically triggers ejection charges at predetermined intervals, and components self-deploy to their final positions without requiring continuous human intervention or control during the deployment process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Area of stationary object

If all components are ejected simultaneously in a radial pattern, then maximum area coverage is achieved, but component density control is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage areaVSAvoidcoverage pattern control
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The ejection system divides components into multiple ejector bays arranged axially along the payload assembly. Each bay can be triggered independently by the timing sequence, allowing the system to segment the ejection event into discrete temporal stages. This enables controlled variation in component density at different locations while maintaining overall area coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The timing sequence implements periodic ejection events with predetermined intervals between successive ejections from different ejector bays. This periodic action creates distinct temporal phases of component deployment, allowing control over the spatial distribution and density patterns of components across the coverage area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Shape

If payload assembly rotates during flight, then radial ejection pattern is achieved, but precise component placement and orientation are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveejection patternVSAvoidcomponent placement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The stabilizer is deployed in advance of the ejection event to counteract and prevent unwanted rotation of the payload assembly during flight. By establishing stability beforehand, the system ensures that the payload maintains a fixed orientation throughout the ejection sequence, enabling precise control over component placement and orientation while still achieving the desired radial ejection pattern.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables precise and autonomous deployment of sensors and munitions in various patterns, reducing soldier workload and exposure, while providing flexible coverage from maximum density to maximum area coverage.

Implementation Method 1

The stabilizer is realized by a small drogue parachute that is deployed upon release of the payload assembly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectParachute: Parachute

Implementation Method 2

a small drogue parachute that is deployed upon release of the payload assembly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic drag: Drag

Implementation Method 3

Each ejector bay is operative to retain the respective components until a respective ejection event upon which the ejector bay ejects all the components of the ejector bay in a generally radial direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectExplosion: Explosion

Data Source

PatentEP2102578B1Controlled dispense system for deployment of components into desired pattern and orientation
Publication Date: 2017.07.12 TEXTRON SYSTEMS CORP
  • EP2102578B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2102578B1 patent drawingFigure 3~5(b)
  • EP2102578B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A dispenser system provides a means to automatically deploy systems using a controlled dispense approach capable of providing desired operational flexibility. Components such as unattended ground sensors (UGS) are deployed according to a method which includes incorporating the components into an elongated ejection system to form a payload assembly, the ejection system including axially-displaced ejector bays each for holding respective components. Each ejector bay retains the respective components until a respective ejection event upon which the ejector bay ejects the components in a radial direction. The payload assembly includes a stabilizer such as a drogue parachute that substantially prevents the payload assembly from rotating about its elongated axis. A timing sequence for the ejection events is programmed into the ejection system to achieve a desired coverage pattern of the components after deployment. The timing sequence can be chosen to result in a coverage pattern along a continuum from maximum component density to maximum total area coverage. The payload assembly is subsequently released from an aerial vehicle above the area with activation of the timing sequence, such that the ejection events occur during flight of the payload assembly at respective times after its release.