Aerial Vehicle Return Control With In-Flight User Intervention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aerial vehicles in auto return mode lack operational flexibility, as users cannot intervene or perform emergency actions during the return process, limiting their control and safety.

Innovation Solution

An aerial vehicle control method and system that adjusts power output based on both return point position information and flight control instructions received during the return process, allowing for flexible operation and user intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the aerial vehicle operates in auto return mode, then the return process is automated and simple to operate, but the user cannot intervene or perform emergency actions during return

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of return processVSAvoiduser intervention capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between two operational states: auto return mode for normal operation and manual control mode for intervention. The flight control system can transition from automated power output control based solely on return point position to manual control when flight control instructions are received, allowing the operational characteristics to be adaptive rather than fixed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring for flight control instructions during the return process. When instructions are detected, the system responds by adjusting power output according to these instructions, creating a closed-loop control mechanism that enables user intervention while maintaining the base auto return functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the aerial vehicle follows a fixed return path to the return point, then the navigation is simple and reliable, but the vehicle cannot avoid obstacles or perform user-defined actions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation reliabilityVSAvoidobstacle avoidance capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The navigation system transitions from a static fixed-path approach to a dynamic path adjustment mechanism. The flight control system monitors for flight control instructions that may indicate obstacle detection or user-defined actions, and dynamically adjusts the return path accordingly, maintaining reliability through continuous monitoring while gaining adaptability through responsive path modification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If the aerial vehicle uses automated power output control based on return point position, then the control system is simple, but the operational flexibility is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidoperational flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The flight control system is designed to perform multiple functions: it executes automated power output control based on return point position information, and simultaneously monitors for and processes flight control instructions. This multi-functionality allows a single control system to handle both simple automated returns and complex intervention scenarios without requiring separate dedicated systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system incorporates feedback by continuously monitoring for flight control instructions during the return process. When instructions are detected, the system adjusts power output accordingly, creating a responsive control mechanism that maintains simplicity through a unified control architecture while achieving flexibility through feedback-driven adjustments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11511857B2Aerial vehicle control method and aerial vehicle
Publication Date: 2022.11.29 SZ DJI TECH CO LTD
  • US11511857B2 patent drawing
  • US11511857B2 patent drawing
  • US11511857B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An aerial vehicle control method includes detecting a flight control instruction during returning of an aerial vehicle to a return point along a return trajectory according to an auto return instruction. The flight control instruction determines a predetermined trajectory different from the return trajectory. The method further includes generating a superimposed instruction by superimposing return point position information indicating the return point and the flight control instruction. The superimposed instruction determines a flight trajectory that is an integration of the return trajectory and the predetermined trajectory and that is different from the return trajectory and the predetermined trajectory. The method also includes controlling the aerial vehicle to fly along the flight trajectory according to the superimposed instruction.