Aerodynamic Bicycle Fork with Composite Airfoil Crown

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional bicycle front fork designs expose a significant surface area to airflow, leading to increased aerodynamic drag and turbulence, which hampers speed in competitive cycling events.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a solid core made of end-grain balsa wood blocks, encased in a composite material shell, forming an elongate crown that extends at an oblique angle from the steerer tube, with fork blades angled close to horizontal to reduce frontal area exposure, and integrates with the down tube to form an airfoil shape, minimizing drag.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional front fork designs are used, then structural simplicity and ease of manufacture are maintained, but aerodynamic drag increases due to significant exposed surface area

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidaerodynamic drag
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The fork crown is constructed as a composite structure with a balsa wood core encased in a carbon fiber reinforced polymer shell. This composite construction allows the crown to achieve complex aerodynamic shaping while maintaining structural integrity and stiffness, resolving the contradiction between manufacturing simplicity and aerodynamic performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The fork crown is shaped with curved surfaces and an airfoil profile that conforms to the bicycle frame geometry. The curved design eliminates sharp edges and creates smooth airflow transitions, reducing aerodynamic drag while the curvature allows for optimized structural strength in the composite material construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the crown is shaped to form an airfoil and fill gaps, then aerodynamic drag is reduced, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic dragVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fork crown is divided into distinct functional segments: a balsa wood core providing structural support and a carbon fiber reinforced polymer shell providing aerodynamic shaping. This segmentation allows each material to be optimized for its specific function, reducing overall manufacturing complexity while achieving complex aerodynamic goals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the fork crown are constructed with different material properties - the balsa wood core provides structural strength where needed, while the carbon fiber shell provides aerodynamic smoothness. This local differentiation of material quality allows complex aerodynamic shaping without proportionally increasing overall manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Area of stationary object

If fork blades are angled close to horizontal, then frontal area exposure is minimized, but structural stability may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrontal areaVSAvoidstructural stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The fork blades are constructed as composite structures with carbon fiber reinforced polymer that provides both structural stability and the ability to angle blades close to horizontal. The composite material's high strength-to-weight ratio maintains structural integrity even at extreme angles that would compromise simple metal constructions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The fork blade angle is optimized to a specific parameter range close to horizontal, and the composite material properties are adjusted to compensate for the reduced vertical component. This parameter optimization maintains structural stability while minimizing frontal area exposure, resolving the contradiction between aerodynamic efficiency and structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration significantly reduces aerodynamic drag by minimizing exposed surface area and eliminating air pockets between the front wheel and down tube, enhancing speed and aerodynamic efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

the crown, the front wheel, and the down tube are configured to collectively form an airfoil

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAirfoil: Aerofoil

Data Source

PatentUS10633049B2Aerodynamic front fork for a bicycle
Publication Date: 2020.04.28 LOGAN WILLIAM F
  • US10633049B2 patent drawing
  • US10633049B2 patent drawing
  • US10633049B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An aerodynamic front fork assembly for a bicycle may include an elongated crown portion extending from a steerer tube to a distal end behind a front wheel, with one or more fork blades projecting in a generally forward direction from the distal end of the crown portion to engage the front wheel. The crown portion may substantially fill the gap between the front wheel and the down tube of the bicycle, thereby collectively forming an airfoil with the front wheel and the down tube.