Aerodynamic Vehicle Heat Exchanger With Low-Drag Body Panels

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional heat exchangers in vehicles are aerodynamically inefficient, contributing significantly to aerodynamic drag, which negatively affects vehicle speed, fuel economy, and overall performance.

Innovation Solution

An aerodynamic heat exchanger design that integrates with vehicle panels, utilizing free convection, radiation, and forced convection modes, with a curved nose and airfoil-shaped front suspension struts to minimize flow separation and drag, and incorporates fluidly-separate chambers for easy serviceability and reduced weight, using a water-glycol mixture to reduce refrigerant circulation and pressure loss.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If conventional heat exchanger designs are used to meet cooling demands, then heat rejection capacity is sufficient, but aerodynamic drag increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The heat exchanger is merged with the vehicle body panel, forming an integrated structure where the heat exchanger becomes part of the aerodynamic surface. This eliminates separate heat exchanger components that would create drag, while maintaining heat rejection functionality through the integrated design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The heat exchanger incorporates a curved nose and airfoil-shaped front suspension struts that follow aerodynamic curvature principles. These curved surfaces guide airflow smoothly over the heat exchanger, preventing flow separation and minimizing pressure drag while maintaining sufficient heat transfer surface area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Area of stationary object

If vehicle body openings and protrusions are added for heat exchanger installation, then heat transfer surface area increases, but aerodynamic efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The heat exchanger is merged with the vehicle body panel, forming an integrated structure where the heat exchanger becomes part of the aerodynamic surface. This eliminates separate heat exchanger components that would create drag, while maintaining heat rejection functionality through the integrated design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The heat exchanger utilizes the third dimension by incorporating internal passages and channels within the body panel thickness. This allows sufficient heat transfer surface area to be achieved without adding external protrusions, as the heat exchange surfaces are embedded within the panel structure rather than extending outward.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Temperature

If conventional heat exchanger structures are used, then cooling performance is adequate, but energy consumption increases due to drag

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The heat exchanger is merged with the vehicle body panel, forming an integrated structure where the heat exchanger becomes part of the aerodynamic surface. This eliminates separate heat exchanger components that would create drag, while maintaining heat rejection functionality through the integrated design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The design converts the previously harmful aerodynamic drag into a beneficial effect by shaping the heat exchanger surfaces to guide airflow constructively. The airfoil-shaped struts and curved surfaces that would normally create turbulence instead generate smooth airflow patterns that reduce overall vehicle drag while maintaining cooling performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design achieves effective heat transfer with negligible aerodynamic drag, improving fuel economy and vehicle performance by reducing energy consumption and increasing driving range, while maintaining sufficient heat rejection capacity.

Implementation Method 1

Aerodynamic heat exchanger designs rely on a variety of modes of heat transfer, including free convection, radiation, and/or forced convection

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFree convection: Free Convection

Implementation Method 2

Aerodynamic heat exchanger designs rely on a variety of modes of heat transfer, including free convection, radiation, and/or forced convection

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadiation: Radiation

Implementation Method 3

Aerodynamic heat exchanger designs rely on a variety of modes of heat transfer, including free convection, radiation, and/or forced convection

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForced convection: Forced Convection

Data Source

PatentUS11752830B1Aerodynamic heat exchanger for a vehicle
Publication Date: 2023.09.12
  • US11752830B1 patent drawing
  • US11752830B1 patent drawing
  • US11752830B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An aerodynamic vehicle includes an aerodynamic heat exchanger formed as one or more body panels disposed along an outer surface of the vehicle having one or more fluidic chambers or micro-channels. The aerodynamic heat exchanger is adapted to provide effective and highly efficient heat transfer, and also to provide substantially reduced or negligible contribution to the aerodynamic drag. The aerodynamic heat exchanger may provide adequate heat rejection capacity throughout vehicle operating conditions that advantageously results in increased fuel economy and overall vehicle performance.