Aerodynamically Enhanced Premixer for Gas Turbine Emissions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing gas turbine engine premixers face challenges in increasing flow velocity at the boundary layer while optimizing vane shape and swirler positioning to reduce emissions of NOx, unburned hydrocarbons, and carbon monoxide, particularly in urban areas, while maintaining fuel efficiency and operational costs.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of an aerodynamically enhanced premixer design that controls the boundary layer profile through reduced mixer-to-mixer proximity, premixer vane tilt with compound angles, reduced nozzle/mixer tilt sensitivity, mixer foot contouring, and the use of purge slots, along with a twin radial mixer, to optimize fuel efficiency and emission reduction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If mixer-to-mixer proximity is reduced and swirlers are positioned closer together, then fuel efficiency is improved and emissions are reduced, but boundary layer control becomes more difficult to optimize

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel efficiencyVSAvoidboundary layer control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by tilting only specific premixer vanes by specific angles (e.g., 10-30 degrees) to create localized flow control zones. This selective vane tilting optimizes the boundary layer profile at critical locations near the fuel nozzle while maintaining simpler structures elsewhere, resolving the contradiction between improved fuel efficiency and reduced control complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-configuring the vane tilt angles and mixer spacing during the design phase to establish optimal boundary layer profiles before combustion occurs. This preliminary geometric configuration eliminates the need for complex active control systems during operation, thereby improving fuel efficiency while keeping the control system simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Object-generated harmful factors

If premixer vane tilt with compound angles is used, then boundary layer profile control is improved and emissions are reduced, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemissions (NOx, unburned hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide)VSAvoidvane shape precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the vane structure into multiple sections with different tilt angles (compound angles), where each segment is optimized for a specific function. This segmentation allows for reduced emissions through improved boundary layer control while enabling modular manufacturing that可以降低 precision requirements for each individual segment compared to a fully complex single-piece design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If nozzle/mixer tilt sensitivity is reduced, then system robustness is improved, but flow velocity control at the boundary layer becomes more challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenozzle/mixer tilt sensitivityVSAvoidflow velocity at boundary layer
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service through the reduced nozzle/mixer tilt sensitivity design, where the geometry is configured to automatically maintain stable flow characteristics without requiring precise alignment during installation. The self-aligning feature robustly maintains flow velocity at the boundary layer through inherent geometric properties rather than active control, resolving the contradiction between system robustness and flow velocity control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design achieves improved fuel efficiency and reduced emissions by enhancing boundary layer control, minimizing aerodynamic losses, and allowing for closer swirler positioning, resulting in a 10-20% reduction in NOx emissions and increased fuel atomization efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

a boundary layer profile over the fuel nozzle (center-body) is controlled to minimize emissions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBoundary layer control: Boundary Layer

Implementation Method 2

aerodynamically enhanced premixer design that controls the boundary layer profile

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic enhancement: Aerofoil

Implementation Method 3

premixer vane tilt to include the use of compound angles... increased flow velocity at the flow boundary layer... mixing efficiency

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid mixing: Turbulence

Implementation Method 4

Additional boundary layer control is realized using purge slots... and a splitter when employed with a twin radial mixer... increased fuel atomization efficiency

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFuel atomization: Spray

Data Source

PatentUS11421884B2System for aerodynamically enhanced premixer for reduced emissions
Publication Date: 2022.08.23 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • US11421884B2 patent drawing
  • US11421884B2 patent drawing
  • US11421884B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A System for Aerodynamic Premixer for Reduced Emissions comprising a premixer is generally cylindrical in form and defined by the relationship in physical space between a first ring, a second ring, and a plurality of radial vanes. The first and second rings are found to be generally equidistant, one from the other, at all points along their facing surfaces. Radial vanes connect the first ring to the second ring and thereby form the premixer.