Aerogel Sheet Thickness Uniformity via Supercritical Drying

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aerogel sheets exhibit nonuniform thickness and poor heat insulation and durability.

Innovation Solution

A method involving steps such as immersing a blanket in silica sol, introducing a gelling catalyst, aging, surface modification, and a multi-stage drying process using carbon dioxide under controlled temperature and pressure conditions to produce an aerogel sheet with uniform thickness and enhanced insulation properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional drying methods are used on aerogel sheets, then the drying process is simple and quick, but the aerogel sheet exhibits nonuniform thickness and poor durability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethickness uniformityVSAvoiddrying process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The drying process is divided into multiple sequential stages: supercritical drying phase, depressurization phase, and drying phase. Each stage has specific pressure and temperature control parameters, transforming a single complex drying operation into manageable segments that achieve uniform thickness while maintaining reasonable process complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent systematically changes pressure and temperature parameters throughout the drying process. Pressure transitions from supercritical levels (above 73 bar) to atmospheric levels, while temperature is maintained and adjusted at different stages. These parameter changes enable controlled solvent removal that prevents thickness nonuniformity and improves durability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If conventional drying methods are used on aerogel sheets, then the drying process is simple and quick, but the aerogel sheet exhibits poor heat insulation performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat insulation performanceVSAvoiddrying process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The drying process is divided into multiple sequential stages: supercritical drying phase, depressurization phase, and drying phase. Each stage has specific pressure and temperature control parameters, transforming a single complex drying operation into manageable segments that achieve uniform thickness while maintaining reasonable process complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent systematically changes pressure and temperature parameters throughout the drying process. Pressure transitions from supercritical levels (above 73 bar) to atmospheric levels, while temperature is maintained and adjusted at different stages. These parameter changes enable controlled solvent removal that prevents thickness nonuniformity and improves durability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If a multi-stage drying process with controlled parameters is implemented, then uniform thickness and excellent heat insulation are achieved, but the manufacturing time and process complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethickness uniformityVSAvoidmanufacturing cycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The drying process is divided into multiple sequential stages: supercritical drying phase, depressurization phase, and drying phase. Each stage has specific pressure and temperature control parameters, transforming a single complex drying operation into manageable segments that achieve uniform thickness while maintaining reasonable process complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent systematically changes pressure and temperature parameters throughout the drying process. Pressure transitions from supercritical levels (above 73 bar) to atmospheric levels, while temperature is maintained and adjusted at different stages. These parameter changes enable controlled solvent removal that prevents thickness nonuniformity and improves durability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method results in an aerogel sheet with superior insulation and durability, achieving uniform thickness and improved heat insulation performance.

Implementation Method 1

a first drying step of injecting carbon dioxide at a rate of 70 L/min for ten minutes under environments of a temperature of 28°C and a pressure of 70 bar to dry the blanket of which the surface is modified

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSupercritical drying: Supercritical Drying

Implementation Method 2

A silica precursor solution is subjected to sol-gel polymerization reaction to form gel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSol-gel polymerization: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 3

a third drying step of injecting carbon dioxide at a rate of 0.7 L/min for 20 minutes under a temperature of 50°C and a pressure of 150 bar to dry the blanket again

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Data Source

PatentEP3260417B1Method for producing aerogel sheet
Publication Date: 2019.03.27 LG CHEM LTD
  • EP3260417B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3260417B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3260417B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method for manufacturing an aerogel sheet. The method for manufacturing an aerogel sheet includes: a step (a) of immersing a blanket in an impregnation vessel in which silica sol is stored to impregnate the silica sol; and a step (b) of injecting a gelling catalyst to a surface of the blanket in which the silica sol is impregnated to gelate the silica sol.