Aerosol Provision Device Cover Mechanism for Debris Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing smoking alternatives that release compounds without burning tobacco lack effective mechanisms for controlling the insertion and ejection of aerosol-generating materials, leading to potential debris ingress and inefficient operation.

Innovation Solution

A cover mechanism for aerosol provision devices featuring a rotating actuating member that translates between open and closed positions, guided by parallel channels and cam arrangements, to control the passage of aerosol-generating materials, with a retaining mechanism to secure the actuating member in desired positions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If no cover mechanism is provided for the opening, then the device structure remains simple, but debris can ingress into the chamber and aerosol-generating materials cannot be controlled during insertion and ejection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedebris preventionVSAvoidcover mechanism structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cover member is designed to be movable between open and closed positions rather than being fixed, allowing it to dynamically adapt to different operational states. This dynamic design enables the cover to prevent debris ingress when closed while allowing controlled insertion and ejection of aerosol-generating materials when open, thus improving reliability without requiring a permanently complex closed structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The cover member acts as an intermediary element between the opening and the chamber, mediating the interaction between the external environment and the internal chamber. It selectively controls what enters or exits the chamber, preventing debris while allowing controlled passage of materials, thereby resolving the contradiction between protection and accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If the cover member is always in the closed position, then debris ingress is prevented, but aerosol-generating materials cannot be inserted or ejected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial insertion and ejectionVSAvoiddebris ingress
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The cover member transitions from a static closed state to a dynamic system that can open and close as needed. This allows the device to switch between protection mode (closed) and operation mode (open), enabling easy insertion and ejection of materials when required while maintaining debris prevention when the cover is closed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The cover member operates periodically, alternating between closed and open states based on operational requirements. During non-operational periods, it remains closed to prevent debris ingress; during operational periods, it opens to allow material insertion and ejection, thus resolving the contradiction between continuous protection and periodic accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Reliability

If the actuating member allows free rotation, then operation is simple, but the cover member cannot be retained in specific positions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition retentionVSAvoidretaining mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The retaining mechanism acts as an intermediary between the actuating member and the cover member, mediating the transmission of rotational motion while providing position retention. It allows the actuating member to rotate freely for simple operation while ensuring the cover member is held securely in specific positions, thus resolving the contradiction between operational simplicity and position control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The retaining mechanism replaces the need for complex mechanical constraints on the actuating member by using a lighter, simpler retention system that only engages with the cover member. This substitution maintains position retention reliability while preserving the freedom of rotation for simple operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20250295173A1Aerosol provision device
Publication Date: 2025.09.25 NICOVENTURES TRADING LTD
  • US20250295173A1 patent drawing
  • US20250295173A1 patent drawing
  • US20250295173A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An aerosol provision device including a body having an opening; a chamber in the body arranged to receive at least a portion of an article including aerosol generating material through the opening; and a cover mechanism. The cover mechanism includes a cover member arranged to at least partially cover the opening; and an actuating member arranged to rotate on the body to actuate the cover member. Rotation of the actuating member relative to the body causes the cover member to translate between a relatively open position in which the at least a portion of an article is able to pass through the opening and a relatively closed position in which the at least a portion of an article is prevented from being able to pass through the opening.