Nanoparticle Production Control in Aerosol Flame Reactors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for synthesizing nanoparticles in aerosol flame reactors face challenges in optimizing and controlling particle size distribution and scaling up production while maintaining desired particle size and shape, with existing solutions being either expensive, time-consuming, or limited in applicability.

Innovation Solution

A system and method integrating an aerosol flame reactor with process instruments and a simulation tool that couples flame dynamics and particle population balance models to optimize and control mean particle size and specific surface area, allowing for scalable nanoparticle production by determining operating data, mixing characteristics, and burner configuration influences.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If flame aerosol synthesis is used for industrial scale production, then productivity is improved, but particle size distribution becomes wide and difficult to control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction scaleVSAvoidparticle size distribution
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically varying multiple process parameters including flame temperature, pressure level, residence time distribution, turbulence characteristics, burner geometry, and reactant flow rates to achieve narrow particle size distribution while maintaining high production rates. The optimization involves adjusting these parameters in combination rather than individually, transforming the process from uncontrolled to precisely tuned for both productivity and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback control through real-time monitoring of particle size distribution and using this information to adjust process parameters. Online measurement techniques are employed to track particle characteristics, and the data feeds back to control systems that modify flame conditions, reactant flows, or residence time to maintain desired particle size distribution during continuous operation at industrial scale.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Length of moving object

If temperature is decreased at downstream to enable particle growth, then particle size increases, but particle structure becomes irregular and distribution widens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle sizeVSAvoidparticle structure regularity
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by implementing a dynamically optimized temperature profile along the reactor length rather than a simple monotonic decrease. The temperature distribution is carefully controlled to provide sufficient heat for structured particle growth while avoiding excessive temperatures that cause irregular structures. The system dynamically balances temperature conditions to achieve both desired particle size and structural regularity through precise thermal management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the particle growth process into distinct zones along the reactor: a nucleation zone, a controlled growth zone with optimized temperature gradient, and a cooling zone. By segmenting the temperature profile and residence time into functional zones, the process achieves regular particle structures during growth while controlling final particle size, preventing the formation of irregular structures that occur with uncontrolled temperature decrease.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Manufacturing precision

If extensive experimentation is conducted to optimize particle size, then manufacturing precision is improved, but time consumption and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle size controlVSAvoidoptimization time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by conducting systematic preliminary studies to establish the relationships between process parameters and particle characteristics before full-scale optimization. Initial experiments identify key parameter ranges and interactions, creating a foundation for subsequent optimization that reduces the total experimentation required. This preliminary characterization of parameter effects allows for more efficient targeted optimization with fewer trials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces extensive physical experimentation with computational modeling and simulation methods to predict particle size distribution outcomes. Computer-based models simulate the flame aerosol process, allowing virtual optimization of parameters before implementing changes in the physical system. This substitution of computational analysis for mechanical experimentation significantly reduces time and cost while maintaining optimization effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables cost-effective, time-efficient optimization and control of particle size distribution and scale-up of nanoparticle production, reducing the need for extensive experimentation and providing insights into the dynamic behavior of the reactor, thus improving process design and reducing pilot plant studies.

Implementation Method 1

Chemical reactions occur in the gas phase in the flame at high temperatures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 2

Growth of the particles by coagulation and/or surface reaction to form product particles due to decrease in the temperature at downstream in the reactor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCondensation: Condensation

Data Source

PatentUS9002521B2System for optimizing and controlling particle size distribution and for scale-up of nanoparticle production in an aerosol flame reactor
Publication Date: 2015.04.07 TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD
  • US9002521B2 patent drawing
  • US9002521B2 patent drawing
  • US9002521B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a system for optimizing and controlling the particle size distribution and scale-up of production of nanoparticle in an aerosol flame reactor. The method provides nanoparticles with desired, optimized and controlled particle size and the specific surface area in aerosol reactors using a simulation tool with programmed instructions. The simulation tool couples flame dynamics model and particle population balance model.