Aerostat Pod Motion Simulation Test System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing pod performance test systems for near space aerostats have limited test ranges due to an inability to fully simulate the complex motion states of pods, resulting in incomplete performance evaluations.

Innovation Solution

A pod performance test system comprising a human-computer interaction test control device, a motion simulation control device, a suspension device, and a motion simulation anti-twisting mechanism, which allows for the simulation of various complex motion states by receiving user-input motion control parameters, controlling the motion simulation anti-twisting mechanism, and displaying motion and performance state information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the pod is suspended on a simple suspension frame for performance testing, then the test setup is simple and easy to implement, but the motion state simulation is limited and cannot fully represent actual complex motion conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion state simulation capabilityVSAvoidtest system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The suspension frame is transformed from a static structure to a dynamic one by adding active motion simulation mechanisms. The platform can perform multi-degree-of-freedom movements including pitching, rolling, and yawing motions to simulate complex aerostat motion states, thereby resolving the contradiction between simulation capability and structural simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The test system integrates multiple functions into a unified platform that can simulate various motion states (pitching, rolling, yawing) and perform different types of performance tests. This multi-functional design enhances adaptability without proportionally increasing complexity, as the same mechanical structure serves multiple simulation purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the pod is tested only during gradual motion from initial rotation to still position, then the test process is simple, but the performance test range is limited and cannot cover all actual motion states

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance test rangeVSAvoidtest operation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The test platform implements dynamic motion simulation with controllable pitching, rolling, and yawing movements. This allows the system to reproduce various actual motion states of aerostats during operation, expanding the performance test range beyond the limited gradual motion sequence to include complex multi-axis motion patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates sensors and control mechanisms that provide feedback on the platform's motion state. This feedback enables precise control and reproduction of specific motion conditions, allowing operators to systematically test performance across a comprehensive range of motion states while maintaining operational control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If a complex motion simulation system is implemented to fully simulate actual motion states, then the performance test range is expanded, but the device complexity and control difficulty increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion state simulation accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex motion simulation is divided into separate controllable modules: pitching mechanism, rolling mechanism, and yawing mechanism. Each module can be independently controlled and tested, which simplifies the overall control system while maintaining the capability to simulate complex combined motion states through coordinated operation of the segmented components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system expands the performance test range of pods by simulating complex motion states, enabling comprehensive performance evaluations and improving the accuracy of test results.

Implementation Method 1

a servo motor, a box body, and eyebolts... The second end of the long shaft sleeve is connected to the servo motor by screws

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic conversion: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

An outside of a second end of the long shaft sleeve is sleeved with the bearing, an outside of the bearing is sleeved with the bearing base

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRolling friction reduction: Ball Bearing

Data Source

PatentUS20240310251A1Pod performance test system and method for near space aerostat
Publication Date: 2024.09.19 AEROSPACE INFORMATION RES INST CAS
  • US20240310251A1 patent drawing
  • US20240310251A1 patent drawing
  • US20240310251A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A pod performance test system for a near space aerostat includes: a HCI test control device, a motion simulation control device, a suspension device, and a motion simulation anti-twisting mechanism. The HCI test control device is electronically connected to the motion simulation control device, the motion simulation anti-twisting mechanism and a pod of the near space aerostat separately. The motion simulation control device is electronically connected to the motion simulation anti-twisting mechanism. The motion simulation anti-twisting mechanism is connected to the pod by a connector. The motion simulation control device controls the motion simulation anti-twisting mechanism to simulate various complex motion states according to a motion control parameter from the HCI test control device, and thus the pod is in the various complex motion states. When the pod is in the various complex motion states, performance test results of the pod under the various complex motion states can be obtained.