Auto Focus Three-Location Ball Support for Tilt Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing auto focus systems in camera modules suffer from tilt faults due to frequent changes in ball contact points, leading to balance collapse and errors in focus adjustment, especially in slim designs with a high thickness-to-width ratio.

Innovation Solution

A three-location supporting structure using three larger balls to maintain consistent point contact between the AF carrier and the housing, preventing changes in contact points and ensuring horizontal stability during optic-axial movement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple balls of the same size are used for support, then the structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but contact point changes cause tilt faults and balance collapse

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact point stabilityVSAvoidball supporting structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating the sizes of balls in the supporting structure. Specifically, it uses a combination of large balls and small balls at different locations rather than uniform balls. The large balls are positioned at critical contact points to maintain stable support, while small balls fill other positions. This non-uniform distribution resolves the contradiction by creating localized quality differences that prevent contact point changes and tilt faults, thereby improving reliability without requiring complete structural redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs asymmetry by arranging balls of different sizes in an asymmetric pattern rather than a symmetric uniform arrangement. The asymmetric distribution of large and small balls creates a stable contact configuration that prevents the AF carrier from tilting during movement. This asymmetric structure ensures that contact points remain consistent, solving the reliability issue while maintaining reasonable structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Stability of the object's composition

If four balls with greater size are disposed on outer sides for support, then horizontal support is enhanced, but simultaneous point contact cannot be achieved due to size variations and friction differences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehorizontal stabilityVSAvoidpoint contact consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by strategically positioning large balls at specific locations where they are most needed for horizontal stability, rather than uniformly increasing all ball sizes. The large balls are placed at outer support positions to maximize horizontal stability, while smaller balls are used in positions where they adequately provide support. This localized differentiation achieves consistent point contact by matching ball size to functional requirements at each location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses partial action by employing only three large balls instead of four, positioned at critical locations for horizontal support. This partial application of the large-ball concept is sufficient to achieve the desired horizontal stability and consistent point contact, avoiding the excessive complexity and manufacturing precision requirements that would result from using four equally large balls throughout the structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Adaptability or versatility

If the AF carrier extends in horizontal direction, then the structure can accommodate components, but gravity influence increases causing tilt fault

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent accommodationVSAvoidtilt resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by concentrating large balls at the outer horizontal positions of the AF carrier, where they provide maximum leverage resistance against gravitational tilt. The large balls are strategically positioned at locations farthest from the center of rotation, creating localized strong support points that counteract the increased gravitational influence on extended horizontal components. This localized reinforcement maintains reliability while allowing horizontal extension for component accommodation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively prevents tilt faults, maintaining horizontal stability and improving focus accuracy even in slim designs with high pixel quality and sensitive tilt changes.

Implementation Method 1

a magnet (a permanent magnet) is installed at an AF carrier (or, a moving body), a coil is installed at a fixed body (a housing, or another-type carrier or the like), and a power of a suitable intensity is applied to the coil to generate an electromagnetic force at the coil (provided at the fixed body) and the magnet (provided at the moving body) so that the moving body moves in an optic-axial direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic force: Lorentz Force

Implementation Method 2

a friction is minimized by means of rotating motions of the balls and point contact of the balls, so that the AF carrier may move in the optic-axial direction more flexibly and more accurately

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 3

even though a ball is adhered to one side of the AF carrier due to an attractive force generated between the magnet of the AF carrier and the yoke provided at the fixed body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic attraction: Magnetism

Data Source

PatentUS10054759B2Apparatus for auto focus with three-location supporting structure
Publication Date: 2018.08.21 JAHWA ELECTRONICS
  • US10054759B2 patent drawing
  • US10054759B2 patent drawing
  • US10054759B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus for auto focus with a three-location supporting structure includes a first frame having a magnet; a second frame having an AF coil, configured to move the first frame in an optic-axial direction; and a plurality of balls located between the first frame and the second frame to maintain a spaced state of the first frame and the second frame, wherein among the plurality of balls, three balls have a greater size than the other balls.