Automated AFM Artifact Detection via Multi-Channel Image Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images often contain artifacts such as streaks, which can be misinterpreted as contaminants, leading to inefficiencies and high costs due to the need for manual screening by trained specialists, especially with the increased speed of fast scan AFM technologies.

Innovation Solution

A method and system using multiple channels of AFM image data to identify and classify artifacts, specifically distinguishing streak artifacts from actual contaminants by comparing data types, allowing for automated detection and classification of image quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual screening by trained specialists is used to identify artifacts and contaminants in AFM images, then detection accuracy is improved, but productivity is reduced and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveartifact detection accuracyVSAvoidimage screening throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical screening process with an automated computational system. The automated artifact detection system uses image processing algorithms to identify and classify artifacts and contaminants in AFM images, substituting human specialists with a computational mechanism that operates at higher speeds while maintaining detection accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by allowing the AFM imaging system to automatically detect and classify its own artifacts and contaminants without requiring external manual intervention. The automated detection system processes images independently, identifying streak artifacts, contamination artifacts, and true contaminants through computational analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If manual screening is used to distinguish streak artifacts from contaminants, then false positives are reduced, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse positive rateVSAvoidscreening time per image
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification of image features into artifact categories (streak artifacts, contamination artifacts, true contaminants) before final interpretation. By pre-identifying and labeling potential false positives through automated pattern recognition, the system reduces false positives while maintaining rapid processing speeds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The automated detection system replaces manual expert analysis with computational algorithms that consistently identify streak artifacts versus true contaminants. This substitution eliminates human variability and fatigue, providing reliable false positive reduction without the time cost of manual review

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If fast scan AFM technology is used to increase scanning speed, then productivity is improved, but artifact generation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescanning speedVSAvoidstreak artifacts
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful effect of streak artifacts into a beneficial classification category. By developing automated detection algorithms that specifically identify streak artifact patterns, the system transforms what was previously a harmful interference with image quality into a recognizable and classifiable feature, allowing fast scan operation to continue while artifacts are automatically distinguished from true contaminants

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Data Source

PatentUS11288809B2Automated detection of artifacts in scan image
Publication Date: 2022.03.29 SEAGATE TECH LLC
  • US11288809B2 patent drawing
  • US11288809B2 patent drawing
  • US11288809B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of analyzing an atomic force microscope image includes receiving data related to an atomic force microscope image, where the data includes at least a first channel of data and a second channel of data relating to a first and second image data type. The method also includes identifying at least a first location of high contrast within the image using the first image data type using edge detection and identifying a first artifact within the image based on the identified first location of high contrast. The method also includes accessing the second image data type corresponding to the identified first location of the first artifact and determining a type of the first artifact by comparing the first image data type with the second image data type relating to the identified location of the first artifact.