Afterimage Compensation via Application Risk Ranking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional afterimage compensation technologies in electronic devices consume excessive power and accumulate unnecessary data, as they sample and process image data regardless of the screen shape, leading to inefficient power usage and limited adoption due to high battery consumption.

Innovation Solution

An electronic device assigns an afterimage risk priority to each application based on its execution screen, generates afterimage data by sampling only those screens with high risk, and delivers this data to the display driver integrated circuit (DDI) for targeted afterimage prevention or compensation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If sampling is performed regardless of the shape of execution screen, then afterimage compensation can be applied to all applications, but power consumption increases unnecessarily

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveafterimage compensation effectivenessVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different sampling strategies to different applications based on their execution screen characteristics. Applications with uniform luminance regions are sampled, while those without are not sampled, creating a localized quality approach that matches compensation effort to actual need.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the sampling parameter (whether to sample) based on the afterimage risk priority of each application. This parameter change allows the system to adapt sampling behavior dynamically, reducing power consumption by sampling only when necessary for effective compensation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If sampling is performed regardless of the shape of execution screen, then comprehensive afterimage data is collected, but the amount of accumulated data increases in proportion to display resolution and usage time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveafterimage compensation accuracyVSAvoidaccumulated data volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the necessary sampling operations by identifying and processing only those applications with high afterimage risk priority. This extraction principle reduces data accumulation by eliminating unnecessary sampling of applications that do not require afterimage compensation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of sampling all applications equally, the system performs partial action by sampling only the subset of applications that exceed the specified afterimage risk priority threshold. This partial action approach maintains compensation accuracy for at-risk applications while avoiding unnecessary data accumulation from low-risk applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If DDI accesses processor or memory for processing sampling data at specified time intervals, then afterimage compensation is performed continuously, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveafterimage compensation continuityVSAvoidsystem operational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses periodic action by sampling at specified time intervals, but only for applications with high afterimage risk priority. This periodic approach maintains continuous compensation for critical applications while reducing overall system complexity by not continuously sampling all applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts sampling behavior based on application characteristics and afterimage risk priority. This dynamic approach allows the DDI to access processor or memory only when necessary, reducing operational complexity while maintaining compensation effectiveness for applications that need it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11302227B2Method for compensating for degradation on basis of execution screen of application and electronic device implementing same
Publication Date: 2022.04.12 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US11302227B2 patent drawing
  • US11302227B2 patent drawing
  • US11302227B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is an electronic device including a display, a display driving circuit which drives the display, and at least one processor operationally connected to the display or the display driving circuit, wherein the at least one processor gives an afterimage risk ranking to each of a plurality of applications, and, when an application given an afterimage risk ranking higher than a designated range among the plurality of applications is executed, generates afterimage data by accumulating images sampled from the execution screens of the application given the afterimage risk ranking higher than the designated range, and delivers the afterimage data to the display driving circuit. Various other embodiments that can be understood through the present specification are also possible.