Agent Trajectory Clustering for Adaptive Task Assignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems lack an efficient method to select tasks for agents in environments based on their specific characteristics and performance, leading to suboptimal resource utilization and task assignment.

Innovation Solution

A task selection system that classifies agents into categories using an agent classification model and assigns tasks based on a task selection policy associated with each category, optimizing task selection to enhance performance and learning progress.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If tasks are assigned without agent classification, then the task assignment process is simple, but resource utilization and task completion efficiency are suboptimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask completion efficiencyVSAvoidtask selection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments agents into distinct categories based on their characteristics and performance metrics. By dividing the homogeneous agent population into heterogeneous groups (e.g., novice agents, expert agents, specialized agents), the system can assign tasks more effectively according to each category's capabilities, thereby improving task completion efficiency without overwhelming complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of task assignment from a uniform approach to a classification-based approach. By introducing agent categories as a new parameter dimension, the system transforms the task selection process to consider multiple agent attributes (performance history, skill levels, current state), enabling more efficient resource utilization while maintaining manageable system complexity through structured classification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If a single task selection policy is used for all agents, then the system is easy to manage, but task assignment optimality is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask assignment optimalityVSAvoidtask selection policy complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by creating different task selection policies tailored to specific agent categories. Each category receives a customized policy that matches its characteristics (e.g., novice agents receive simpler, more guided tasks while expert agents receive complex, challenging tasks). This localized approach improves assignment optimality while keeping individual policies simple enough to manage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces dynamics by making task selection policies adaptive to agent categories. Policies can be dynamically adjusted based on category performance, allowing the system to evolve and improve task assignment optimality over time without requiring complete policy redesign, thus managing complexity through incremental adaptation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If agent categories are not updated, then the system operates stably, but task assignment becomes suboptimal as agents evolve

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask assignment efficiencyVSAvoidsystem adaptability to agent evolution
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor agent performance and characteristics. Based on this feedback, the system updates agent categories and their associated task selection policies to reflect current agent states. This closed-loop approach ensures task assignment efficiency is maintained even as agents evolve, while adapting to changes without requiring complete system redesign

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11485014B1Learning agent categories using agent trajectory clustering
Publication Date: 2022.11.01 LATENT STRATEGIES LLC
  • US11485014B1 patent drawing
  • US11485014B1 patent drawing
  • US11485014B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on a computer storage medium for selecting actions for an agent in an environment. In one aspect, a system comprises receiving an agent trajectory that characterizes interaction of an agent with an environment to perform one or more initial tasks in the environment; processing the agent trajectory to generate a classification output that comprises a respective classification score for each agent category in a set of possible agent categories, wherein each possible agent category is associated with a respective task selection policy; classifying the agent as being included in a corresponding agent category based on the classification scores; selecting tasks to be performed by the agent in the environment based on the task selection policy of the corresponding agent category; and transmitting, to the agent, data defining the selected tasks to be performed by the agent in the environment.