Aggregate Control Server for Remote Vehicle Interaction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing remote control vehicles in public entertainment venues lack a system to aggregate and respond to multiple electronic inputs from spectators, limiting their interactive engagement and entertainment value.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising an aggregation and control server that receives and processes user direction inputs from various electronic devices, directing a remote control vehicle based on aggregated responses, allowing for dynamic movement and interaction with spectators.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a remote control vehicle is used in public entertainment venues, then spectator entertainment is improved, but interactive engagement with multiple spectators is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinteractive engagementVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into multiple independent input devices (mobile phones, tablets, computers) distributed among spectators, each capable of sending individual control signals. This allows multiple spectators to interact with the vehicle simultaneously without requiring a complex centralized control interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A server acts as an intermediary between spectator input devices and the remote control vehicle. The server receives control signals from multiple spectators, processes them according to predetermined rules (such as proximity-based control or voting mechanisms), and transmits the aggregated control commands to the vehicle, simplifying the overall system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If control signals are received from multiple electronic devices, then spectator involvement is enhanced, but signal aggregation and processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectator involvementVSAvoidsignal processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The server implements a universal control aggregation platform that can handle multiple types of electronic devices (mobile phones, tablets, computers) and various input methods through a single standardized interface. This multi-functional approach allows the system to accommodate different spectator devices without requiring separate processing logic for each device type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes control parameters dynamically based on vehicle state and spectator input. For example, when the vehicle is near a particular spectator group, the control weight shifts to that group; or when multiple spectators input directions, the system aggregates them using weighted algorithms based on proximity, device type, or other predetermined criteria, simplifying the processing of multiple simultaneous inputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If the vehicle responds to aggregated inputs dynamically, then entertainment value increases, but control reliability may decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic responsivenessVSAvoidcontrol reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system establishes predetermined control rules and algorithms before operation begins, such as proximity-based control权重分配, voting mechanisms for conflicting directions, or priority schemes for different device types. These pre-programmed rules ensure that dynamic aggregation of multiple inputs follows consistent, reliable logic rather than arbitrary decisions, maintaining control reliability while enabling dynamic responsiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The server continuously monitors control signals from multiple spectators and the vehicle's current state, applying feedback mechanisms to resolve conflicts and maintain reliable control. For example, if multiple spectators send conflicting directional commands, the feedback loop evaluates current vehicle position, spectator proximity, and predetermined rules to determine the optimal aggregated command, ensuring reliable and predictable vehicle behavior despite multiple inputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9910431B1System and method for aggregate control of a remote control vehicle
Publication Date: 2018.03.06 BEAUCHAMP CHRISTOPHER
  • US9910431B1 patent drawing
  • US9910431B1 patent drawing
  • US9910431B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for aggregate control of a remote control vehicle includes an aggregation and control server configured to receive user direction inputs from a plurality of electronic devices associated with spectators at an entertainment venue. Based on the user direction inputs and information and program instructions in data storage, the aggregation and control server generates control outputs communicated to the remote control vehicle via a remote control transmitter.