Aggregate Processing Control System for Throughput Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In the aggregate processing industry, businesses face challenges in competitively bidding and delivering aggregate products to specifications within tight time frames due to variable factors like human resources, equipment wear-and-tear, and weather conditions, making it difficult to meet volume, specification, and time frame targets while maintaining profitability.

Innovation Solution

A control system that integrates production tracking, quality control, and emergency shutdown procedures, utilizing sensors and a programmable logic controller to optimize throughput, monitor conveyor conditions, and adjust configurations to ensure aggregate meets specifications, while reducing downtime and maintenance costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a control system integrates production tracking, quality control, and emergency shutdown procedures with sensors and programmable logic controller, then production optimization and specification compliance are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethroughput optimizationVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines production tracking, quality control, and emergency shutdown procedures into a single integrated control system. The programmable logic controller centrally coordinates conveyor operation, screen plant configuration, and aggregate processing parameters, allowing multiple functions to be managed through one unified system rather than separate control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system performs multiple functions simultaneously: it tracks production volumes, monitors aggregate specification compliance through sensor data, adjusts conveyor speeds, modifies screen plant configurations, and executes emergency shutdown procedures. This multi-functional approach consolidates what would traditionally require separate systems into one universal control platform.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If conveyor sensors and control mechanisms are used to monitor and adjust conveyor operation, then production optimization is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction optimizationVSAvoidconveyor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Conveyor sensors continuously monitor operational parameters such as speed, load, and positioning, feeding this data back to the programmable logic controller. The controller automatically adjusts conveyor operation based on this feedback to optimize production flow and maintain specification compliance, reducing the need for manual intervention and simplifying overall system management despite the added sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If screen plant configuration is adjusted to meet aggregate specifications, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaggregate specification complianceVSAvoidscreen plant complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The screen plant configuration is made dynamically adjustable through the control system. Screen decks can be repositioned, screen apertures can be changed, and processing parameters can be modified in real-time based on aggregate feed characteristics and specification requirements. This dynamic adaptability allows precise control over output specification while centralizing control logic to manage the complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If automated control and monitoring systems are implemented, then downtime reduction is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedowntime reductionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system includes predictive monitoring capabilities that detect potential failures or specification deviations before they cause downtime. Sensors monitor equipment conditions and aggregate properties in advance, allowing the system to take preliminary corrective actions such as adjusting parameters or initiating maintenance protocols before actual failures occur, thereby reducing unplanned downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9146554B2Aggregate processing control system
Publication Date: 2015.09.29 HOBAN ADAM G
  • US9146554B2 patent drawing
  • US9146554B2 patent drawing
  • US9146554B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An aggregate processing plant for processing aggregate to a pre-determined specification within a particular gravel pit may include: a feed hopper, at least a first screen plant having a corresponding configuration and cooperating with the feed hopper, a first conveyor set cooperating with the first screen plant for conveying screened aggregate from the first screen plant, a first aggregate processing cooperating with the first conveyor set and downstream of the screen plant in a direction of flow of the screened aggregate on the first conveyor.