Aggregate Surface Energy Testing via Static Drop Method

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing static drop method for testing aggregate surface energy does not consider the surface texture factor, resulting in significant differences in test results compared to the vapor adsorption method, which is more accurate but costly and resource-intensive.

Innovation Solution

A method that involves grinding and pretreating aggregates to create polished and original samples, measuring their surface texture indices, and using the static drop method to calculate surface energy while accounting for the influence of surface texture through a functional relationship, allowing the original aggregate's surface energy to be determined.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If the traditional static drop method is used to test aggregate surface energy, then the test cost is reduced and the instrument is more conventional, but the test accuracy deteriorates due to ignoring surface texture factors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest costVSAvoidtest accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing surface grinding on aggregates before conducting the static drop test. This pre-treatment step modifies the aggregate surface to a standardized state, eliminating the variability caused by natural surface textures. By preparing the aggregate surface in advance, the method enables accurate surface energy measurement using the simpler and less expensive static drop method, thus resolving the contradiction between test cost and test accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If the vapor adsorption method is used to test aggregate surface energy, then the test accuracy is improved, but the test cost increases and test resources become scarce

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest accuracyVSAvoidtest cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the copying principle by creating a standardized aggregate surface model through grinding. Instead of using the complex vapor adsorption method directly, the invention creates a controlled, reproducible surface state that can be tested with simpler equipment. This copying of the ideal test condition (smooth, standardized surface) allows the use of less expensive static drop methodology while maintaining accuracy comparable to vapor adsorption methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Ease of operation

If aggregates are smoothed before static drop test, then the test can be performed, but the surface texture of aggregate is destroyed which affects test representativeness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest feasibilityVSAvoidtest representativeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically varying the grinding parameters (grinding time, pressure, abrasiveness) to achieve an optimal balance. The surface is modified to a standardized state that eliminates excessive texture variability while preserving enough surface characteristics to represent the aggregate material. This controlled parameter adjustment allows the static drop test to be performed reliably without completely destroying the aggregate's surface identity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach improves the accuracy of the static drop method by considering surface texture, enabling it to replace the vapor adsorption method at a lower cost, with results showing close agreement to traditional methods and reduced testing costs.

Implementation Method 1

using static drop method to test contact angle of the polished aggregate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectContact angle: Wetting

Data Source

PatentUS11982608B2Method for testing surface energy of aggregate based on static drop method
Publication Date: 2024.05.14 WUHAN UNIV OF TECH
  • US11982608B2 patent drawing
  • US11982608B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a method for measuring surface energy of aggregates based on static drop method, comprising (1) aggregates grinding and pretreatment; (2) obtaining the surface texture index; (3) calculating the surface energy based on static drop method experiment; (4) fitting to obtain a functional relationship between the surface texture index and surface energy; (5) calculating the surface energy of the original aggregate. The method considers the influence of the grinding process on the surface texture of the aggregates when measuring the surface energy of the aggregates, which significantly improves the accuracy of the static drop method test. The static drop method can be used to replace the vapor adsorption method to test the surface energy of aggregate, and the low-cost optical contact angle instrument can replace the expensive magnetic suspension weight balance system to test the surface energy of aggregate, which greatly reduces the test cost.