Aggregated Frame Integrity Verification in Wireless Data Transmission

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In wireless communication, data integrity verification between transmitting and receiving terminals is challenging due to exposure risks, and existing methods lack efficient mechanisms for ensuring the integrity of data frames during transmission.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for generating and transmitting an aggregated frame with a frame header, a first subframe, and a second subframe, where the first subframe includes integrity verification information based on the frame header and a secure frame counter (SFC) value, and the second subframe uses a generated SFC value to ensure data integrity without including it in the frame, utilizing secure headers and nonces for encryption and verification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If data is transmitted using wireless communication, then communication efficiency is improved, but data integrity and security deteriorate due to exposure risks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication efficiencyVSAvoiddata integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The data transmission is segmented into multiple subframes within an aggregated frame structure. Each subframe can be independently verified for integrity, allowing selective validation without requiring retransmission of entire data sets, thus maintaining communication efficiency while improving data integrity verification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Integrity verification information is generated and embedded in each subframe before transmission. This preliminary action allows the receiving terminal to verify data integrity immediately upon reception without requiring additional round-trip communication, maintaining efficiency while ensuring reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If encryption methods are used to prevent data exposure, then data security is improved, but verification complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata securityVSAvoidverification complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The integrity verification information is extracted and embedded within each subframe structure. This allows verification to be performed independently of the encryption/decryption process, reducing verification complexity while maintaining security through the use of cryptographic hash functions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

A secure frame counter (SFC) is introduced as an intermediary element that provides a deterministic basis for generating integrity verification information. This mediator simplifies the verification process by providing a predictable sequence that both transmitter and receiver can use to validate data without complex cryptographic operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If integrity verification information is included in each subframe, then data integrity is improved, but frame size and transmission overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata integrityVSAvoidframe size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Integrity verification information is applied locally to each subframe rather than to the entire aggregated frame. This allows compact verification data to be embedded in each subframe header, providing granular integrity checking while minimizing overall overhead through efficient use of space in the subframe structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If secure frame counter values are included in the frame header, then integrity verification is improved, but information exposure risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegrity verificationVSAvoidinformation exposure risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The secure frame counter (SFC) parameter is changed from being explicitly transmitted in the frame header to being generated deterministically at the receiving terminal based on received data. This parameter transformation eliminates the need to transmit the SFC value itself, reducing information exposure risk while maintaining integrity verification capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10708279B2Method and apparatus for transmitting data
Publication Date: 2020.07.07 ELECTRONICS & TELECOMM RES INST
  • US10708279B2 patent drawing
  • US10708279B2 patent drawing
  • US10708279B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for transmitting data. Data to be transmitted is an aggregated frame including a first subframe and a second subframe each including information used to verify integrity of each subframe, and an apparatus receiving the data verifies integrity of a subframe based on the information used to verify the integrity.