Aggregated Point-Solution Mapping for Assembly Layouts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing assembly operations lack an interrelationship between different metrics and point solutions, leading to inefficient problem identification and resolution in product manufacture, as each metric is addressed independently without considering interrelated issues affecting assembly operations.

Innovation Solution

A device and method for aggregated point-solution mapping that accesses various system data types, determines functional locations, and correlates them to a layout mapping, comparing data types with thresholds to generate visual indicators for display, thereby interrelating point solutions without altering underlying data structures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If multiple independent point solutions are used to address different metrics (quality control, equipment maintenance, personnel attendance), then each specific problem can be resolved, but no interrelationship between different metrics can be discerned and generalized problem areas cannot be identified

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveInterrelationship information between metricsVSAvoidSystem integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple independent point solutions (quality control, equipment maintenance, personnel attendance metrics) into a single integrated system that displays all metrics on one graphical user interface. This merging allows interrelationships between different metrics to be discerned while maintaining the independence of each data source, resolving the contradiction between information loss and system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a universal platform that handles multiple different metric types through a common architecture. The graphical user interface can display various data types (quality, maintenance, attendance) using consistent visual indicators and thresholds, providing multi-functionality without requiring separate systems for each metric, thus preventing information loss about interrelationships.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If visual indicators are generated for unfavorable comparisons to highlight problem areas, then problem identification efficiency is improved, but the system complexity increases due to additional processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveProblem identification efficiencyVSAvoidData processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses visual indicators (such as color-coded alerts, graphical icons, or highlighted regions) on the display device to indicate unfavorable comparisons between actual metric values and threshold values. This visual representation immediately highlights problem areas without requiring complex analysis, improving problem identification efficiency while keeping processing requirements manageable through standardized visual coding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates simplified visual representations (copies) of the underlying data relationships. Instead of processing and analyzing raw metric data in complex ways, the system generates visual indicator data that copies and represents the essential problem information in an easily interpretable format, thereby improving efficiency without proportionally increasing processing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS10852703B2Aggregated point-solution mapping
Publication Date: 2020.12.01 TOYOTA MOTOR ENG & MFG NORTH AMERICA INC
  • US10852703B2 patent drawing
  • US10852703B2 patent drawing
  • US10852703B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and device for aggregate point-solution mapping is disclosed. The aggregate point-solution mapping includes accessing a plurality of system data types for an assembly operation. For each of the plurality of system data types, a functional location is determined that relates to the assembly operation, and correlating the functional location to a layout mapping for the assembly operation. Each of the plurality of system data types are compared with a respective data type threshold to produce a status result. Upon an unfavorable comparison, visual indicator data is generated for the status result, and presented for display via the layout mapping at the functional location.