Aggregated Security Assessment for Emerging Entity Impact Detection
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Assessing entity strategic impact is difficult due to the multitude of disparate data sources, requiring time-consuming manual analysis that may miss emerging strategic impacts.
Innovation Solution
An automated system using a machine learning model processes data from multiple sources, including entity officer reports, regulatory feeds, and social media, to determine a strategic impact confidence level and generate reports with alerts for potential impacts, enabling real-time monitoring and preventive actions.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If manual analysis of multiple disparate data sources is performed, then comprehensive strategic impact assessment can be achieved, but the process becomes time-consuming and may miss emerging impacts
Solution Approach 1:
The patent replaces manual mechanical analysis with an automated machine learning system that processes strategic impact indicators from multiple data sources. The system uses trained models to automatically determine confidence levels and generate assessments, eliminating the time-consuming manual review process while maintaining comprehensive coverage of all data sources including news feeds, social media, and regulatory filings.
Solution Approach 2:
The system enables self-service automated assessment by continuously monitoring multiple data sources and generating strategic impact assessments without human intervention. The machine learning models automatically process incoming data, update confidence levels, and produce reports, allowing the organization to maintain continuous strategic awareness without dedicating manual analytical resources.
2Measurement precision
If data from multiple disparate sources is aggregated and processed, then accurate strategic impact assessment is achieved, but system complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the complex assessment system into distinct functional modules: data collection from multiple sources, strategic impact indicator extraction, machine learning model processing, confidence level determination, and report generation. Each module handles a specific aspect of the assessment, making the overall complex system manageable and maintainable while preserving measurement precision through specialized processing at each stage.
Solution Approach 2:
The system introduces strategic impact indicators as intermediary elements that bridge multiple disparate data sources and the final confidence level determination. These indicators serve as standardized intermediaries that translate diverse source data into a common framework that the machine learning model can process, reducing system complexity by creating a uniform interface between data sources and analysis.
3Speed
If real-time monitoring of strategic impacts is implemented, then emerging issues are detected earlier, but network and processing strain increases
Solution Approach 1:
The system implements periodic action by continuously monitoring data sources at optimized intervals rather than processing every incoming data point in real-time. The machine learning models process aggregated strategic impact indicators at scheduled intervals, enabling timely detection of emerging issues while reducing network and processing strain through batch processing of accumulated data rather than continuous real-time analysis.
Solution Approach 2:
The system extracts only the most relevant strategic impact indicators from voluminous data sources, filtering out unnecessary information before processing. This extraction approach enables real-time monitoring of critical signals while minimizing network bandwidth consumption and processing resources by focusing only on high-value indicators that indicate emerging strategic impacts.
Data Source
AI summary
Systems, computer program products, and methods are described herein for assessing entity strategic impact using aggregated data sources. The method includes receiving at least one strategic impact indicator from each of at least two strategic impact data sources. The at least one strategic impact indicator relates to an entity strategic impact of an entity. The method also includes determining, via a machine learning model, a strategic impact confidence level for the entity. The strategic impact confidence level indicates a likelihood of an emerging strategic impact relating to the entity. The method further includes generating a strategic impact assessment report. The strategic impact assessment report indicates at least the strategic impact confidence level for the entity. The strategic impact assessment report also includes a strategic impact alert in an instance in which the strategic impact confidence level is below a threshold strategic impact level.


