Aggregated Signal Feedback for SaaS Root Cause Detection in Multi-Cloud SD-WAN

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for determining the root cause of degraded user experience in SaaS applications within multi-cloud SD-WAN deployments are inadequate, as they rely on granular telemetry metrics that do not accurately reflect application performance and often misattribute issues to network paths rather than local edge conditions.

Innovation Solution

An Aggregated Signal Feedback (ASF) mechanism is introduced, where edge devices collect telemetry data, detect anomalies using machine learning, and provide an indication to SaaS providers to determine the root cause of performance degradation, incorporating local edge metrics such as CPU usage, memory, and queue depth.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If granular telemetry metrics are used to determine root cause of degraded user experience, then detailed network path information is obtained, but measurement precision deteriorates due to misattribution of issues to network paths rather than local edge conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroot cause identification accuracyVSAvoidperformance metric accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the telemetry data into two distinct categories: granular network path metrics (latency, loss, jitter) and local edge device metrics (CPU usage, memory, queue depth). This segmentation allows the system to analyze both types of data separately and combine them for accurate root cause determination, preventing misattribution of edge device issues to network path problems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary analysis layer that correlates network path metrics with local edge device metrics. This intermediary mechanism acts as a mediator between network telemetry and application performance data, enabling accurate attribution of performance degradation to the correct source (network path vs. edge device) by comparing timing and correlation of anomalies across both metric types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If multiple telemetry metrics are collected from edge devices, then comprehensive monitoring is achieved, but device complexity increases due to data collection and anomaly detection requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication performance monitoringVSAvoidedge device processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements partial action by collecting only the most critical telemetry metrics from edge devices (CPU usage, memory utilization, queue depth) rather than attempting to monitor all possible device parameters. This selective approach provides sufficient reliability for root cause determination while keeping the data collection and processing complexity at edge devices manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables edge devices to perform self-service anomaly detection by comparing their local metrics against predefined thresholds and patterns. The edge devices autonomously identify and report anomalies without requiring complex centralized analysis, reducing the processing burden on individual devices while maintaining comprehensive monitoring capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If local edge metrics are incorporated into anomaly detection, then root cause identification is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to more complex data analysis requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroot cause determination accuracyVSAvoidperformance optimization simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the system continuously monitors both network path metrics and local edge device metrics, automatically correlates anomalies between them, and provides actionable insights about root causes. This feedback loop simplifies operation by automatically performing the complex analysis that would otherwise require manual intervention, presenting operators with clear conclusions about whether performance degradation originates from network paths or edge devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3849143B1Aggregated signal feedback for saas experience in multi-cloud sd-wan deployments
Publication Date: 2026.01.28 CISCO TECHNOLOGY INC
  • EP3849143B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3849143B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP3849143B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

In embodiments, an edge device located at an edge of a local network provides connectivity between the local network and a cloud-based software as a service (SaaS) provider via one or more interfaces. The edge device obtains telemetry data associated with the edge device for a plurality of metrics. The edge device makes a determination that one or more of the plurality of metrics is anomalous. The edge device sends, based on the determination, an indication of the determination to the SaaS provider. The SaaS provider uses the indication to determine a root cause of an application served by the SaaS provider experiencing degraded application performance.