Aggregated Trend Provision with Privacy Preservation
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Conventional online software distribution systems face challenges in providing business insights to software makers without compromising the privacy of other software makers' data, particularly when aggregated trends could reveal individual trends, potentially exposing competitive information.
Innovation Solution
Implementing a method that selectively provides aggregated trends by computing a measure of disorder in individual trends and determining whether to share them based on this measure, as well as analyzing similarity between trends to ensure privacy is maintained, using a two-stage procedure to decide on the provision of aggregated trends.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Loss of information
If aggregated trends are provided to software makers, then business insights and performance evaluation capabilities are improved, but privacy of individual software makers' data may be compromised
Solution Approach 1:
The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism (aggregated trend data) that mediates between the need for business insights and privacy protection. By providing aggregated trends rather than individual data, the system enables performance evaluation while preventing direct exposure of individual software makers' private information. The aggregation process acts as a buffer that preserves utility while protecting privacy.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent transforms individual trend parameters into aggregated parameters, changing the scale and granularity of data presentation. By shifting from individual software maker metrics to aggregated category metrics, the system maintains analytical value while reducing privacy risks. This parameter transformation allows software makers to evaluate performance relative to peers without exposing their specific data.
2Adaptability or versatility
If aggregated trend data is made available, then software makers can evaluate performance relative to others, but individual trends may be identified and exposed
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies partial action by providing aggregated trend data rather than complete individual data. This partial disclosure enables performance evaluation capabilities while intentionally withholding enough information to prevent identification of individual trends. The aggregation includes sufficient data points to show relative performance but excludes the specificity needed for identification.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent creates a simplified copy of individual trends in aggregated form. Rather than providing access to actual individual data, it generates representative aggregated data that mirrors the structure and patterns of individual trends without containing the actual private information. This copying approach preserves analytical utility while ensuring anonymity.
3Loss of information
If complete transparency of trend data is provided, then full business intelligence is achieved, but competitive information between software makers is exposed
Solution Approach 1:
The patent merges individual trend data into aggregated category data, combining multiple software makers' information into a unified dataset. This merging process preserves the overall business intelligence value while eliminating the ability to distinguish individual performers. The aggregated view provides market context without creating competitive disadvantages for any single software maker.
Data Source
AI summary
A method of selectively providing an aggregated trend obtained from at least a subset of a plurality of individual trends. The method comprises deciding whether to provide the aggregated trend by determining whether an individual trend in at least the subset of the plurality of individual trends can be at least partially identified from the aggregated trend.


