Aggregating System for Comprehensive Steam Trap and Leakage Diagnosis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional system diagnosis methods are insufficient for comprehensive cost savings as they primarily focus on steam trap-related losses and do not account for other cost-wasting factors such as fluid leakage, system construction obsolescence, and maintenance inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A method that performs batch diagnoses including trap operation, fluid leakage, system improvement, and maintenance improvement diagnoses, providing comprehensive economic advantages and facilitating accurate decision-making for cost reduction, with automated data generation and reporting to streamline the process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If conventional steam trap diagnosis method is used, then trap-passed steam loss can be calculated and presented, but comprehensive cost saving opportunities are missed due to ignoring other cost-wasting factors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteam lossVSAvoidcomprehensive cost saving coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The diagnosis system is expanded to perform multiple diagnostic functions simultaneously - not only steam trap diagnosis but also fluid leakage diagnosis, system construction diagnosis, and maintenance method diagnosis. This multi-functional approach enables comprehensive identification of all cost-wasting factors in the system, transforming a specialized steam trap tool into a universal system optimization platform that addresses energy loss, material loss, and operational inefficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple types of diagnoses are performed separately, then comprehensive cost saving opportunities can be identified, but diagnostic time and reporting complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensive diagnosis coverageVSAvoiddiagnostic and reporting time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple separate diagnostic procedures (steam trap diagnosis, fluid leakage diagnosis, system construction diagnosis, maintenance method diagnosis) are merged into a single integrated batch diagnosis process. The system collects data from various diagnostic sources, processes them together, and generates a unified comprehensive report that presents all cost-saving opportunities in one documentation, eliminating the need for multiple separate reporting sessions and reducing total diagnostic time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Measurement precision

If detailed individual diagnosis results are provided for each steam trap, then precise trap-passed steam loss calculation is achieved, but the complexity of data processing and reporting increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteam loss measurement accuracyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Individual trap diagnosis data, fluid leakage data, system construction data, and maintenance data are merged into an aggregated comprehensive report. The system calculates total cost-wasting amounts by combining individual trap passed steam losses with fluid leakage losses and other cost factors, presenting consolidated results that maintain precision while reducing data processing complexity through aggregation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS7698102B2Method of diagnosing system, method of operating aggregating system for system diagnosis, and aggregating system for system diagnosis
Publication Date: 2010.04.13 TLV CO LTD
  • US7698102B2 patent drawing
  • US7698102B2 patent drawing
  • US7698102B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention provides a method of diagnosing a system, a method of operating an aggregating system for system diagnosis and an aggregating system for system diagnosis, which are effective for achieving comprehensive and effective system cost reduction. For a target system, at least two or more kinds of diagnoses selected from a trap operation diagnosis, a fluid leakage diagnosis, a system improvement diagnosis and maintenance improvement diagnosis are effected in a batch and in reporting the results of these diagnoses in a batch, there are reported an economic advantage MQt″ obtained by reduction in a trap-passed seam loss Qt″, an economic advantage MQs, MQp, MQn obtained by reduction in fluid leakage loss Qs, Qp, Qn, an economic advantage Ma obtained by system improvement and an economic advantage Mb obtained by method improvement in a maintenance method.