Agitator Ball Mill Entraining Profiles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional agitator ball mills have inefficiencies in grinding processes due to suboptimal entrainment of grinding bodies, leading to poor yield, high energy demand, and non-uniform particle size distribution, especially at high filling degrees and lower rotational speeds.

Innovation Solution

The agitator ball mill design features agitating discs with entraining profiles that start at a right angle to the central axis and bend backward, ending before the disc's edge, creating defined circular flows and reducing secondary vortices, allowing for higher filling degrees and lower rotational speeds while maintaining grinding quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional circular entraining profiles with large radius of curvature are used, then dispersion efficiency is increased without destruction of grinding bodies, but entrainment of grinding bodies in the inner portion of the agitating disc is unsatisfactory and secondary vortices are generated at the outer edge

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedispersion efficiencyVSAvoidentrainment efficiency in inner portion
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The entraining profile is divided into two distinct sections: a first section with a large radius of curvature (0.5R to R) for gentle entrainment and dispersion, and a second section with a small radius of curvature (0.05R to 0.2R) for effective outer edge control. This segmentation allows each section to perform its specific function optimally without interfering with the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the entraining profile are given different geometric properties suited to their local functions. The inner portion uses a large radius of curvature to gently accelerate grinding bodies without causing turbulence, while the outer portion uses a small radius of curvature to effectively control the annular gap and prevent secondary vortices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Quantity of substance

If the agitator ball mill operates at high filling degrees with conventional designs, then grinding capacity is increased, but energy demand increases and grinding quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilling degree with grinding bodiesVSAvoidspecific energy demand
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the geometric parameters of the entraining profile, specifically the radius of curvature in different sections. This parameter change allows the system to operate efficiently at high filling degrees (60-80%) with reduced energy consumption by optimizing the flow patterns and reducing turbulent losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Area of stationary object

If entraining profiles continue to the disc periphery, then complete coverage is achieved, but secondary vortices are generated in the annulus between the disc and chamber wall

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage area of entraining profilesVSAvoidsecondary vortices
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The harmful second section of the entraining profile is strategically positioned at the outer edge where it can effectively control the annular gap. By extracting and isolating this small-radius section at the periphery, it prevents secondary vortices without interfering with the primary entrainment function of the large-radius inner section.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Manufacturing precision

If agitating discs rotate at high speed to maintain grinding quality, then particle size distribution is improved, but energy consumption increases and wear increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle size distributionVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

By changing the geometric parameters of the entraining profile (radii of curvature in different sections), the system achieves efficient grinding at lower rotational speeds. The optimized geometry creates better flow patterns that maintain grinding quality without requiring high speeds, thereby reducing energy consumption and wear.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances grinding efficiency and productivity with reduced energy demand, achieving a narrower particle size distribution and minimizing wear on discs and chamber walls.

Implementation Method 1

the grinding bodies which are accelerated outwards by the entraining profiles in their radially outer portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Implementation Method 2

the grinding bodies which are accelerated outwards by the entraining profiles in their radially outer portion are redirected to the upstream grinding cell by the front surface of the respective agitating disc and to the downstream grinding cell by rear surface of the respective agitating disc

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow redirection:

Data Source

PatentUS10173222B2Agitator ball mill
Publication Date: 2019.01.08 WILLY A BACHOFEN AG
  • US10173222B2 patent drawing
  • US10173222B2 patent drawing
  • US10173222B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An agitator ball mill that includes agitating discs (18) on an agitating shaft drivable in a spinning direction (38), which are provided with entraining profiles (35). These entraining profiles (35) are formed by a trailing wall of a respective channel of a plurality of channels (36). In relation to the spinning direction (38) the trailing wall (39) of an inner channel section (49) runs radially straight relative to the central longitudinal axis (15) and has a length f, and has an outer bent-off channel section (41), which is bent off counter to the spinning direction (38). The outer channel sections (41) are closed radially to the outside by a peripheral portion (42) of the agitating disc (18) having a radial width e.